From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4E1C41514 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D0E21670 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="vFr+uyBD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728203AbfHXMs5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 08:48:57 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:35652 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727779AbfHXMs5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 08:48:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id h27so3160401lfp.2; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 05:48:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KWoEeG6vs6VCUSeGXmHbpQT+ujKELvjfgOGYqoxN0II=; b=vFr+uyBDpavs65AlLok3MR+CufBp1mBxwOEujmZshvy2vvsCO8+5X4Jsh5ZvtR3sJy LqavRLPmHKiziNsqIDTFOuYJxCD800oXZyqhwjMtS4ORIeq5F9TP83AO1qiePSK1CPjt 1JUUdm11zfj8/kXKFarfgn14mRZOpmXmDEFUgvx88neKoXyvliFkrw/ZYkviDeykkKfs aTgEbKXlrMS2fBVG8WFrJRMa4ClsaeR95IeRpyl6mdJQkbb7bn+GYWOb5wud1DUUkidT CiS1V7SjkEmP/3VcLKiOvE0DHDLYyjxxvNexw0M0vrJV4GMcb6UjursF1lGq8WTufIlZ 0fVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KWoEeG6vs6VCUSeGXmHbpQT+ujKELvjfgOGYqoxN0II=; b=iyRQqO8io3WViSA/ceLC2UvOXmc5Et0z9a5rDmSilSlRNW1FPdcRnTTG9bXExq14e+ vDEk9Xh3FyxF+uHaWkFj8VG4pIgazYneoyHlwoS+fNUTv8aeAxovMKKefcn5rRGtNLmh 2TNHiF3gMWVxcm9hSLYNPXjUIWCK7l+1UOHp4ZQePPjcR+lPXkou/gsYwzMWZDA8mnNL wMqOs5I1ImBORtJyppydbxnVJxb46cqYSuMQuWMoMT3VymchxeU9HUgYoUxFlOiBxBx5 wrwMWAKi2Ib0CNdy5xtBXB6b9y3i92tjeM5jXNQOwVNy3dwAolPK5B1eiQzqKsLUYQdJ vvXw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUrScnOqgEcm00geEqqiEcfsEXd3+rFeJPvdkmxKzluT0gYIXa+ 7UIHg8RQJeQaUbQcH3mFdN0soq0yap9EpbOLT7I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwnCZ2QCveajf6BQHzrths1C2ZlN+b/72OTA3OlX8P3zC8nnVXdt5C9XMQ+b2iPAbpk1uaWSvp2qjQP5rbA5/U= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:546c:: with SMTP id e12mr5441079lfn.133.1566650934562; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 05:48:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190812215052.71840-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190812215052.71840-12-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190813082744.xmzmm4j675rqiz47@willie-the-truck> <20190813170829.c3lryb6va3eopxd7@willie-the-truck> <20190824112542.7guulvdenm35ihs7@willie-the-truck> In-Reply-To: <20190824112542.7guulvdenm35ihs7@willie-the-truck> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:48:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] arm64: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h To: Will Deacon Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Andrew Morton , Sedat Dilek , Josh Poimboeuf , Yonghong Song , clang-built-linux , Catalin Marinas , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Andrey Konovalov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Enrico Weigelt , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Masayoshi Mizuma , Shaokun Zhang , Alexios Zavras , Allison Randal , Linux ARM , linux-kernel , Network Development , bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:25 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > Which bit are you pinging about? This patch (12/16) has been in -next for a > while and is queued in the arm64 tree for 5.4. The Oops/boot issue is > addressed in patch 14 which probably needs to be sent as a separate patch > (with a commit message) if it's targetting 5.3 and, I assume, routed via > somebody like akpm. I was pinging about the bit I was quoting, i.e. whether the Oops in the cover letter was #14 indeed. Also, since Nick said he wanted to get this ASAP through compiler-attributes, I assumed he wanted it to be in 5.3, but I have not seen the independent patch. Since he seems busy, I will write a better commit message myself and send it to Linus next week. Cheers, Miguel