From: Suchit K <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, sdf@fomichev.me, kuniyu@google.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Revert tx queue length on partial failure in dev_qdisc_change_tx_queue_len()
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 22:15:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO9wTFgYMfDzmL_PfpX4jRKaG2mEZmNq+rLRyprGLN6r23udkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+dif2qjKM6oO1o=BKutXoO6w9kWnnPfc50BDBJ7VpAeQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 21:58, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 9:22 AM Suchit K <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > WRITE_ONCE() is missing.
> >
> > Oops, I'm sorry about that.
> >
> > >
> > > > + while (i >= 0) {
> > > > + qdisc_change_tx_queue_len(dev, &dev->_tx[i]);
> > >
> > > What happens if one of these calls fails ?
> > >
> > > I think a fix will be more complicated...
> >
> > I did consider that, but since I didn’t have a solution, I assumed it
> > wouldn’t fail.
>
> But this definitely could fail. Exactly the same way than the first time.
>
Yeah, it makes sense.
> I also have a question. In the Qdisc_ops structure,
> > there’s a function pointer for change_tx_queue_len, but I was only
> > able to find a single implementation which is
> > pfifo_fast_change_tx_queue_len. Is that the only one? Apologies if
> > this isn’t the right place to ask such questions. I’d really
> > appreciate any feedback. Thank you!
>
> I think only pfifo_fast has to re-allocate its data structures.
>
> Other qdiscs eventually dynamically read dev->tx_queue_len (thus the
> WRITE_ONCE() I mentioned to you)
Yup got it. Thank you so much.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 7:15 [PATCH] net: Revert tx queue length on partial failure in dev_qdisc_change_tx_queue_len() Suchit Karunakaran
2025-07-22 13:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-22 13:56 ` Suchit K
2025-07-22 14:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-22 14:48 ` Suchit K
2025-07-22 15:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-22 16:21 ` Suchit K
2025-07-22 16:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-22 16:45 ` Suchit K [this message]
2025-07-23 18:17 ` Suchit K
2025-07-23 18:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-25 17:47 ` Cong Wang
2025-07-26 11:02 ` Suchit K
2025-07-23 15:52 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAO9wTFgYMfDzmL_PfpX4jRKaG2mEZmNq+rLRyprGLN6r23udkQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).