linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: "Justin M. Forbes" <jforbes@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fedoraproject.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: 3.5.x boot hang after conflicting fb hw usage <driver> vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:55:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9ty9UUZKcgp4MijM9CDGyDaD0dWi2z2htPvjMRHbCHRhUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9tzcmU-uBSaH0jASmp0iCu43fPROefip9mr_Q9qCAMzZEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
>> On 08/17/2012 03:25 PM, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>>
>>> for <driver>, we have verified cases on inteldrmfb, radeondrmfb, and
>>> cirrusdrmfb.
>>>
>>> This is the last message displayed before the system hangs.  This seems
>>> to be hitting a large number of users in Fedora, though certainly not
>>> everyone.  This started happening with the 3.5 updates, and is still an
>>> issue.  It appears to be a race condition, because various things have
>>> allowed boot to continue for some users, though there is no clear work
>>> around. Has anyone else run across this?  Any ideas.  For more
>>> background we have the following bugs:
>>>
>>> inteldrmfb:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843826
>>>
>>> radeondrmfb:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845745
>>>
>>> cirrusdrmfb <kvm>:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843860
>>>
>>> It should be noted that the conflicting fb hw usage message is not new,
>>> it has been around for a while, but this is the last message seen before
>>> the hang.
>>
>>
>> Hi,  (adding dri-devel mailing list)
>>
>>
>> I started seeing this problem on 3.5-rc6.
>>
>> AFAICT, the system is not actually hung, it's just that no output
>> is showing up on the real (physical) output device (display) -- it's
>> going somewhere else (or to the bit bucket).
>>
>
> Can we bisect this at all?
>
> I worry the intel one will bisect to where we moved the conflict
> resolution earlier, but I'd like to see if applying that patch earlier
> causes the issue, since radeon has it.
>
> I haven't reproduced this on any hw I own, I also can't get it under qemu.

I'm also wondering whether this grub2 related in some way, grub2 is
starting to mess with the graphics adapter pointlessly.

Dave.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-17 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17 22:25 3.5.x boot hang after conflicting fb hw usage <driver> vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver Justin M. Forbes
2012-08-17 22:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-17 22:54   ` Dave Airlie
2012-08-17 22:55     ` Dave Airlie [this message]
2012-08-17 23:05       ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-20  5:13       ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-20  5:22         ` Dave Airlie
2012-08-20 22:45           ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-21  0:23             ` Dave Airlie
2012-08-21  0:58               ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPM=9ty9UUZKcgp4MijM9CDGyDaD0dWi2z2htPvjMRHbCHRhUw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jforbes@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).