From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Add x86 valid_phys_addr_range() for /dev/mem
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:58:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j_TS3BXv0SyJzNg_FDdEB9uOmzTtibkS-Z_jAv_PDZiA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455069975-14291-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> x86 does not define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE, which
> leads /dev/mem to use the default valid_phys_addr_range()
> and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range() in drivers/char/mem.c.
>
> The default valid_phys_addr_range() allows any range lower
> than __pa(high_memory), which is the end of system RAM, and
> disallows any range higher than it.
>
> Persistent memory may be located at lower and/or higher
> address of __pa(high_memory) depending on their memory slots.
> When using crash(8) via /dev/mem for analyzing data in
> persistent memory, it can only access to the one lower than
> __pa(high_memory).
>
> Add x86 valid_phys_addr_range() and valid_mmap_phys_addr_range()
> to provide better checking:
> - Physical address range is valid when it is fully backed by
> IORESOURCE_MEM, regardless of __pa(high_memory).
> - Other ranges, including holes, are invalid.
>
> This also allows crash(8) to access persistent memory ranges
> via /dev/mem (with a minor change to remove high_memory check
> from crash itself).
If we're modifying crash(8) can't we also teach it to mmap /dev/pmemX
directly? With commit 90a545e98126 "restrict /dev/mem to idle io
memory ranges" /dev/mem should not have access to active pmem ranges.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-17 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 2:06 [PATCH] x86/mm: Add x86 valid_phys_addr_range() for /dev/mem Toshi Kani
2016-02-17 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-17 16:58 ` Toshi Kani
2016-02-17 17:58 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2016-02-17 19:35 ` Toshi Kani
2016-02-17 19:05 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-17 20:15 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4j_TS3BXv0SyJzNg_FDdEB9uOmzTtibkS-Z_jAv_PDZiA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).