Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre: add BLOCK depends in Kconfig

["Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1560 bytes --]

On 2013/07/25 1:06 AM, "Xiong Zhou" <jencce.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:

>From: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
>
>Add BLOCK depends in Kconfig for LUSTRE to fix this:
>drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fid/../include/linux/lustre_compat25.h:117:2
>: 
>error: implicit declaration of function ʽunregister_blkdevʼ
>
>Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <jencce.kernel@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/Kconfig |    2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/Kconfig
>b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/Kconfig
>index 9ae7fa8..0b45de0 100644
>--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/Kconfig
>+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/Kconfig
>@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> config LUSTRE_FS
> 	tristate "Lustre file system client support"
>-	depends on STAGING && INET && m
>+	depends on STAGING && INET && BLOCK && m
> 	select LNET
> 	select CRYPTO
> 	select CRYPTO_CRC32

The Lustre client does not need a block device - it is a network
filesystem.
The one piece of code that is relevant here relates to a Lustre-optimized
"loop" device that bypasses the VFS, data copying, and DLM locking for use
by swap and such.  It would be better instead to make that code conditional
and add a new CONFIG_LUSTRE_LLOOP or similar, and only make that part
dependent
on BLOCK.

Cheers, Andreas
-- 
Andreas Dilger

Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division


ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥