From: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: introduce add_wait_queue_exclusive_head
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:06:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CF4FEF90.9AF19%andreas.dilger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140319195520.GF8557@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2014/03/19, 1:55 PM, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 07:44:29PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
>> The original reason for l_wait_event() not using TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
>> is to avoid the load on the server continually being
>>"num_service_threads"
>> regardless of whether they are actually doing something or not. We
>> added various cases for periodic wakeups and such afterward.
>
>Hmm, maybe we should finally do the TASK_IDLE thing;
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/12/710
That looks pretty interesting, and appears to do what we need.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 13:10 [PATCH RFC] sched: introduce add_wait_queue_exclusive_head Peng Tao
2014-03-18 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-18 13:51 ` Peng Tao
2014-03-18 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-18 14:44 ` Peng Tao
2014-03-18 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-19 2:22 ` Peng Tao
2014-03-19 17:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-19 19:44 ` Dilger, Andreas
2014-03-19 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-20 7:06 ` Dilger, Andreas [this message]
2014-03-20 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-18 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-19 2:17 ` Peng Tao
[not found] ` <20140319164907.GA10113@redhat.com>
2014-03-19 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 17:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-20 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] wait: introduce WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE_HEAD Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-20 17:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] wait: turn "bool exclusive" arg of __wait_event() into wflags Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-20 17:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] wait: introduce WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE_HEAD Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-21 2:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Dilger, Andreas
2014-03-21 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CF4FEF90.9AF19%andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--to=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=bergwolf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox