From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756447AbYLUA2y (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:28:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755330AbYLUA0d (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:26:33 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50071 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755101AbYLUA00 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:26:26 -0500 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Jeff Kirsher" , "Zdenek Kabelac" References: <_EB9bLpq_z.A.hAC.NkYTJB@chimera> In-Reply-To: <_EB9bLpq_z.A.hAC.NkYTJB@chimera> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #12200] BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:16:15 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12200 Subject : BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac Date : 2008-12-08 11:24 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122873549700644&w=4 Handled-By : Jeff Kirsher Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122905927102071&w=4