From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5766159B6D; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710800346; cv=none; b=FnJwzCTG6vjRNdmOl3dX2GEV/wQr0vLV7c+021kdzNRSgF/29OqpJBWMWxMO3TdW/VykiBF/eulx1I9/ojAq+W+7o+NxVa1EtFAFswkxdMc5V/ffmkr8eGyKI+sebBgXIfpfxhP7nrp4fVOlG8yEl+Alr6MCq9TJO/WfLVTac8w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710800346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bBUdjSqAYdT3A5Fi0UHHxuEbnI27V0nxpNkqe+gPutg=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=LNRmna9APNXZE6c9B6Bou8srhqAOKe0dTCtz5MdcAJjSiJLzkBmmb2QJEwicKrVfOhk+LuhVVSK+TjZJXktJxzWEu8AOJdqEyDTYfkAFiu9Rh8pATWriT8cZKXazTqKTmpbdfzgIP39+0KcD/H+/avrwC3S7v4vzMtNYgxHMqbE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=REvq95K6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="REvq95K6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1C04C433C7; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:19:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710800345; bh=bBUdjSqAYdT3A5Fi0UHHxuEbnI27V0nxpNkqe+gPutg=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=REvq95K6gh9vgQXGpO8my+dqQwJp56Hd8M4yJKDMoK6gryKTdlUJ5SMg4qUXNme/Y T9Vk4oanJQ8NJ7N0vw+HNNgCKweengGZIKvctyUYuO4/anoh9UvzRFv20HXlOK7vAW axiD+V7AZy9ghpASkVVx+B4cZZU6bWXhk7+noQTDWr3Ho3mE7o7NAFs6R6fRwIcJuO S3ityzFzwq7+SiFS87zDrrH+G77OH6cs42Hg9Hq/VDkoqyfpEnOvfgwp5a25gPdraw qfWDgb6kgse6gb5nawFkzAfv0ZFZ2NJS2Ld09MixUvrRqz0IrcBY22EfytIiA9MoZv yBL3d1R0+5eJA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:19:01 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/13] crypto: ecdsa - Extend res.x mod n calculation for NIST P521 From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Lukas Wunner" Cc: "Stefan Berger" , , , , , , , , "Stefan Berger" X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 References: <20240312183618.1211745-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20240312183618.1211745-5-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: On Mon Mar 18, 2024 at 10:39 PM EET, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:33:47PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue Mar 12, 2024 at 8:36 PM EET, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > > > Tested-by: Lukas Wunner > >=20 > > What was there to test in this anyway? I see only comment change below. > > The full series was tested, irrespective of the content of the individual > patches. Tested-by's should be per patch, and in this patch tested-by has no meaning at all. In order to determine which patches tested-by is applicable it can be derived on what was actually tested. This looks as tested-by was used in place of acked/reviewed-by, which is not how it should be used. BR, Jarkko