From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785AF3A262; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711977474; cv=none; b=fv/6JBmWxMY27aYFOpWlRyNTfkruLI8MtIK9kmoswRY5LSsjEiUQTXWord2KhqGQqNpLD4qUkJL6keHpaqHN1Bc/LQ0gydNG/8S7Bvv8arU2tPnrHBLHY2WY+ukJcCV843FpAntQkcJStzQBeb+IE4Qj46vfeMzxpdjV0IxEh/g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711977474; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S9b4HSEM/2PDqziShOQR1wWt0JzsyhQb7gIWzGjTp8k=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=QCP1E8Z81b/FV8mgWvu3JJNr2IWRVaE+argkQAou85MciYyA64Zbtn+tKYyXKbN3ENFiomFVgtHJhD2tYtq/cLm0pr5uihKOTPFOmv7UVewx/nqWkPTPW+8+AaAymYhSI/Eb21q8jIlFxxSh3jYWwyNgc+BO+3jAvgv/In8NRzE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=olEDGg0s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="olEDGg0s" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78219C433C7; Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:17:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711977474; bh=S9b4HSEM/2PDqziShOQR1wWt0JzsyhQb7gIWzGjTp8k=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=olEDGg0sasK0vUUJ0DRnbTjgsazK8GojY7P25lg0oA8J0wgmQm3tm/6VNF4ydA/Gi GwV4WxqAYCvnQ6cAnangoHSUg8P3LIbEnqLprBrBUHFEPFvxeQrzJhEdl9DkDUyGRZ P+7/mkij/BJRqwJIggIfQ6Ilu/byx6Y09cBkllmUpf0Hzx74XKi+Af5YH6bnRB5ih4 SMbW/egiSxPeTi2qN1NZwA8+Xp9e4QNGuafndOSDF7MBJEcR2MBgQV8m9nEn1ZyF7o upaHstcC0quBKA/wgoVAq6Wi4LVST67LlSf9otB/nL9fPWHUoHY/jN8rN+aoCiQ1Xt /FEteglNKksUg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 16:17:50 +0300 Message-Id: Cc: , "Peter Huewe" , "Jason Gunthorpe" , , , Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tpmdd changes for v6.9-rc2 From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Linus Torvalds" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240326143838.15076-1-jarkko@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: On Sun Mar 31, 2024 at 8:01 PM EEST, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 22:57, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > OK, point taken and it is evolutionary issue really but definitely > > needs to be fixed. > > > > I review and test most of the stuff that goes to keyring but other > > than trusted keys, I usually pick only few patches every now and > > then to my tree. > > It's perfectly fine if you send me key updates - you're listed as > maintainer etc, that's not a problem. > > But when I get a tag name that says "tpmdd" and a subject that says > "tpmdd", I'm noty expecting to then see key updates in the pull. > > So that part of my issue was literally just that your subject line and > tag name didn't match the contents, and that just makes me go "there's > something wrong here". > > So keys coming through your tree is fine per se, it's just that I want > the subject line etc to actually make sense. > > Linus OK, I'll we'll address no problem :-) I think separate tag and appropriate subject line is sufficient change as we always sync=20 up with these (through IRC channel), i.e. David is aware when I send anything keyring specific. BR, Jarkko