From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.3ffe.de (0001.3ffe.de [159.69.201.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CCFD83CDB for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:03:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.201.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712930605; cv=none; b=IJ7xqYtsY710m7t17At7ju+qM2cOXoqglLkVZZgZ4lSrg+1DFIYQfTcB0TbksnbxYHaWPx8B96tJkT75aeAt49I+YCo1kvDOQqWYiQ6dAWcwCTPQQNWxWV3atI37/pCYfiudx28ASHWYlYpnPbEDmmaAmC5caoDL3YyWwVk7pfw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712930605; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0mJdkfusfJd3v5wVnmvpxzx+okocGpsKuI3Cih1+MeE=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=A87nlVwHpB6MkXIh1DLT9x/VyanHNLljOFiUsqL6JtieGTZSwN+77a+QsnNJp0E8SJjavVMrC8p8EAHEXBkbg3gUJj5rZAIcxrT5tUivNFXidkCg7E/Qtypb8O3JI9+hqagPV7vpNyY1Fu1ePcfOdTz0EJf3OnB07ZsTh0xxyvY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=walle.cc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.201.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=walle.cc Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:810b:4340:6430:4685:ff:fe12:5967]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.3ffe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F2AD3E6; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:03:21 +0200 (CEST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:03:21 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] mtd: spi-nor: get rid of SPI_NOR_NO_FR Cc: , From: "Michael Walle" To: "Tudor Ambarus" , "Pratyush Yadav" , "Miquel Raynal" , "Richard Weinberger" , "Vignesh Raghavendra" X-Mailer: aerc 0.16.0 References: <20240412134405.381832-1-mwalle@kernel.org> <20240412134405.381832-4-mwalle@kernel.org> <14726a74-d54a-432d-a547-3b07ac97d413@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <14726a74-d54a-432d-a547-3b07ac97d413@linaro.org> On Fri Apr 12, 2024 at 4:00 PM CEST, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > > > On 4/12/24 14:44, Michael Walle wrote: > > The evervision FRAM devices are the only user of the NO_FR flag. Drop > > the global flag and instead use a manufacturer fixup for the evervision > > flashes to drop the fast read support. > >=20 > > Don't we want to get rid of FRAMs from SPI NOR? Why the dance then? Yes, but it isn't that easy. There are (three?) in-tree users of these chips. But we can already move all the special handling out of the core. -michael