From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B2712C534; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713276966; cv=none; b=Faw7LPCcqJhjkbuD1lqlC26FCBRWJbvcw33gs1MHM1RIo/tOVU0d8XHBIs/AZzOcQ/xpHpHTdzzm8gZqpf38uAuNio+nYfsK0hq9Lqu4YFnpJS7bbDOQD0RUoY8a6UT3RpKMbVfKdhACIGDumjhWLn/dUy7mDIc521S6B0Cxtkc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713276966; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sO5QJlCa2KzxD9mza+Do+HtQ6W6lgeVJrYewsyMsFVQ=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=uICW11Mh4YcxCTUJNtpVmPtZf0nfRrwKpZdHDQRXlfcY5jtyJ6bXJGO1Lx03ts9fM01CFhgEcH/c8wuvec3pemOnzrRct6a8z2ZQaRmH1L+ybrADKni6z6PxEJpCEtRlYKzzu+K8wczRc/xoY+fNCofWSzh7/M2C9k9wEitk42E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ukcy8ujr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ukcy8ujr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD001C113CE; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:16:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713276966; bh=sO5QJlCa2KzxD9mza+Do+HtQ6W6lgeVJrYewsyMsFVQ=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ukcy8ujrBWNYqmc9aHZJGCHFrSuejzu88Y9AWEC/3BbU/Nm8h0gsKrXGZQSu0IlUs 1XrhvLdAqXR+IuouKFGZhAj97ffE80++XIJUSdM3wXjU0qlMq0wWewboqw/YoFhFAn IxNOrKRLURH6AuXt6u0PpzvsUMuvZMhFXryKqlH2M8RTiev0qMXhqd46J33vOe5gWf iZOErJEi2Us/pVfBd0Fcq1hFKWBLTlzKpBckJ8RoVgR47hpF0dd6DO+BN7eDMkS25n l9nnpvq9B0jHuzEICBMaCzHwwReAqZppHbRFfAcdgJj3d5DTlxBUtp1zTcPpxgcDE7 sBxJIlGM6S/Zg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:15:59 +0300 Message-Id: Cc: "mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com" , "seanjc@google.com" , "anakrish@microsoft.com" , "Zhang, Bo" , "kristen@linux.intel.com" , "yangjie@microsoft.com" , "Li, Zhiquan1" , "chrisyan@microsoft.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/14] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for EPC cgroup testing From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" To: "Huang, Kai" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com" , "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mkoutny@suse.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "haitao.huang@linux.intel.com" , "Mehta, Sohil" , "tj@kernel.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "bp@alien8.de" X-Mailer: aerc 0.17.0 References: <20240416032011.58578-1-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> <20240416032011.58578-15-haitao.huang@linux.intel.com> <6b056faa6de2ba3a15c2e5dd576e96e3f85375ba.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <6b056faa6de2ba3a15c2e5dd576e96e3f85375ba.camel@intel.com> On Tue Apr 16, 2024 at 8:42 AM EEST, Huang, Kai wrote: > >=20 > > I'll send a fixup for this patch or another version of the series if mo= re =20 > > changes are needed. > > Hi Haitao, > > I don't like to say but in general I think you are sending too frequently= . The > last version was sent April, 11th (my time), so considering the weekend i= t has > only been 3 or at most 4 days. =C2=A0 > > Please slow down a little bit to give people more time. > > More information please also see: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/submitting-patches.html#rese= nd-reminders +1 Yes, exactly. I'd take one week break and cycle the kselftest part internally a bit as I said my previous response. I'm sure that there is experise inside Intel how to implement it properly. I.e. take some time to find the right person, and wait as long as that person has a bit of bandwidth to go through the test and suggest modifications. Cannot blame, as I've done the same mistake a few times in past but yeah this would be the best possible corrective action to take. BR, Jarkko