Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: Address !chip->auth in tpm_buf_append_hmac_session*()

Jarkko Sakkinen
2024-07-04T06:52:22Z

On Thu Jul 4, 2024 at 4:56 AM EEST, Stefan Berger wrote:
> [ 1.449673] tpm_ibmvtpm 5000: CRQ initialized
> [ 1.449726] tpm_ibmvtpm 5000: CRQ initialization completed
> [ 2.483218] tpm tpm0: auth session is not active

This expected result and the driver should work as expected.
And it correctly reports that auth session is not active.

The reported error was exactly the TPM errors, which I guess
do not happen anymore.

Reported-by counts as much as reporting the symptom you are
having, i.e. very different from something more "suggestive".

Does that count as tested-by or not?

BR, Jarkko