public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	"Andreas Dilger" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
	James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 11/16] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:03:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D65D88CA.C5E2F%paf@cray.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151358148020.5099.4047116902359752959.stgit@noble>

This probably shouldn¹t contribute to load, it¹s often (mostly?) run out
of the ptlrpcd daemons.

- Patrick

On 12/18/17, 1:18 AM, "lustre-devel on behalf of NeilBrown"
<lustre-devel-bounces@lists.lustre.org on behalf of neilb@suse.com> wrote:

>This use of l_wait_event() is a polling loop that re-checks
>every second.  Make this more obvious with a while loop
>and wait_event_timeout().
>
>Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
>---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/niobuf.c |   14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/niobuf.c
>b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/niobuf.c
>index 0c2ded721c49..5606c8f01b5b 100644
>--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/niobuf.c
>+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/niobuf.c
>@@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ int ptlrpc_unregister_bulk(struct ptlrpc_request
>*req, int async)
> {
> 	struct ptlrpc_bulk_desc *desc = req->rq_bulk;
> 	wait_queue_head_t *wq;
>-	struct l_wait_info lwi;
> 	int rc;
> 
> 	LASSERT(!in_interrupt());     /* might sleep */
>@@ -246,7 +245,7 @@ int ptlrpc_unregister_bulk(struct ptlrpc_request
>*req, int async)
> 
> 	/* the unlink ensures the callback happens ASAP and is the last
> 	 * one.  If it fails, it must be because completion just happened,
>-	 * but we must still l_wait_event() in this case to give liblustre
>+	 * but we must still wait_event() in this case to give liblustre
> 	 * a chance to run client_bulk_callback()
> 	 */
> 	mdunlink_iterate_helper(desc->bd_mds, desc->bd_md_max_brw);
>@@ -270,15 +269,16 @@ int ptlrpc_unregister_bulk(struct ptlrpc_request
>*req, int async)
> 		/* Network access will complete in finite time but the HUGE
> 		 * timeout lets us CWARN for visibility of sluggish LNDs
> 		 */
>-		lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(LONG_UNLINK * HZ,
>-					   HZ, NULL, NULL);
>-		rc = l_wait_event(*wq, !ptlrpc_client_bulk_active(req), &lwi);
>-		if (rc == 0) {
>+		int cnt = 0;
>+		while (cnt < LONG_UNLINK &&
>+		       (rc = wait_event_timeout(*wq, !ptlrpc_client_bulk_active(req),
>+						HZ)) == 0)
>+			cnt += 1;
>+		if (rc > 0) {
> 			ptlrpc_rqphase_move(req, req->rq_next_phase);
> 			return 1;
> 		}
> 
>-		LASSERT(rc == -ETIMEDOUT);
> 		DEBUG_REQ(D_WARNING, req, "Unexpectedly long timeout: desc %p",
> 			  desc);
> 	}
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lustre-devel mailing list
>lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
>http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-18  7:17 [PATCH SERIES 5: 00/16] staging: lustre: use standard wait_event macros NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:17 ` [PATCH 01/16] staging: lustre: discard SVC_SIGNAL and related functions NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:17 ` [PATCH 02/16] staging: lustre: replace simple cases of l_wait_event() with wait_event() NeilBrown
2017-12-18 17:48   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2017-12-18 21:37     ` NeilBrown
2017-12-18 18:03   ` Patrick Farrell
2017-12-19 10:37     ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-12-19 20:49       ` NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:17 ` [PATCH 03/16] staging: lustre: discard cfs_time_seconds() NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:17 ` [PATCH 04/16] staging: lustre: use wait_event_timeout() where appropriate NeilBrown
2017-12-18 20:23   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 07/16] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ldlm_completion_ast() NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 11/16] staging: lustre: make polling loop in ptlrpc_unregister_bulk more obvious NeilBrown
2017-12-18 21:03   ` Patrick Farrell [this message]
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 13/16] staging: lustre: improve waiting in sptlrpc_req_refresh_ctx NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 15/16] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply NeilBrown
2017-12-18 21:09   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 09/16] staging: lustre: simplify waiting in ptlrpc_invalidate_import() NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 05/16] staging: lustre: introduce and use l_wait_event_abortable() NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 06/16] staging: lustre: simplify l_wait_event when intr handler but no timeout NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 14/16] staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_service_unlink_rqbd NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 16/16] staging: lustre: remove l_wait_event from ptlrpc_set_wait NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 10/16] staging: lustre: remove back_to_sleep() and use loops NeilBrown
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 08/16] staging: lustre: open code polling loop instead of using l_wait_event() NeilBrown
2017-12-18 20:55   ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
2017-12-18  7:18 ` [PATCH 12/16] staging: lustre: use wait_event_timeout in ptlrpcd() NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D65D88CA.C5E2F%paf@cray.com \
    --to=paf@cray.com \
    --cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox