From: Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Allow building as kernel built-in
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:31:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D9FKVQL9LOK4.BSCX5E1QNGN1@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y0voy8mn.fsf@intel.com>
On Fri Apr 25, 2025 at 8:59 AM BST, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com> wrote:
>> Fix Kconfig symbol dependency on KUNIT, which isn't actually required
>> for XE to be built-in. However, if KUNIT is enabled, it must be built-in
>> too.
>>
>> Also, allow DRM_XE_DISPLAY to be built-in. But only as long as DRM_I915
>> isn't, since that results in duplicate symbol errors.
>>
>> Fixes: 08987a8b6820 ("drm/xe: Fix build with KUNIT=m")
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Ensure DRM_XE_DISPLAY and DRM_I915 can't both be built-in
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
>> index 9bce047901b22..bc63c396d7fef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> config DRM_XE
>> tristate "Intel Xe Graphics"
>> - depends on DRM && PCI && MMU && (m || (y && KUNIT=y))
>> + depends on DRM && PCI && MMU && (m || (y && KUNIT!=m))
>
> I can't make heads or tails about that. I think expressing the kunit
> dependency on a separate line like this is both much more common and
> clear:
>
> depends on KUNIT || KUNIT=n
Ah, yes that looks like it should do the trick and does seem clearer. Will do in
v3.
>
>> select INTERVAL_TREE
>> # we need shmfs for the swappable backing store, and in particular
>> # the shmem_readpage() which depends upon tmpfs
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ config DRM_XE
>>
>> config DRM_XE_DISPLAY
>> bool "Enable display support"
>> - depends on DRM_XE && DRM_XE=m && HAS_IOPORT
>> + depends on DRM_XE && (DRM_XE=m || DRM_I915!=y) && HAS_IOPORT
>> select FB_IOMEM_HELPERS if DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
>> select I2C
>> select I2C_ALGOBIT
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
Thanks,
Harry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 7:36 [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Allow building as kernel built-in Harry Austen
2025-04-25 7:59 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-25 8:31 ` Harry Austen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D9FKVQL9LOK4.BSCX5E1QNGN1@protonmail.com \
--to=hpausten@protonmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox