* [PATCH] rbtree: rust: add RBTree::is_empty
@ 2025-06-16 10:36 Alice Ryhl
2025-06-17 7:30 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-29 19:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alice Ryhl @ 2025-06-16 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Ojeda; +Cc: rust-for-linux, linux-kernel, Alice Ryhl
In Rust Binder I need to be able to determine whether a red/black tree
is empty. Thus, add a method for that operation to replace
rbtree.iter().next().is_none()
This is terrible, so add a method for this purpose. We do not add a
RBTree::len method because computing the number of elements requires
iterating the entire tree, but checking whether it is empty can be done
cheaply.
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
---
rust/kernel/rbtree.rs | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
index 8d978c8967475cc2631b50721798f7e8cd1551fd..9457134eb3afdf7a214a28fcbe2e6b8065cc9a86 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
@@ -191,6 +191,12 @@ pub fn new() -> Self {
}
}
+ /// Returns true if this tree is empty.
+ #[inline]
+ pub fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
+ self.root.rb_node.is_null()
+ }
+
/// Returns an iterator over the tree nodes, sorted by key.
pub fn iter(&self) -> Iter<'_, K, V> {
Iter {
---
base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
change-id: 20250616-rbtree-is-empty-28f51fccb99a
Best regards,
--
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rbtree: rust: add RBTree::is_empty
2025-06-16 10:36 [PATCH] rbtree: rust: add RBTree::is_empty Alice Ryhl
@ 2025-06-17 7:30 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-29 19:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benno Lossin @ 2025-06-17 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alice Ryhl, Miguel Ojeda; +Cc: rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On Mon Jun 16, 2025 at 12:36 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> In Rust Binder I need to be able to determine whether a red/black tree
> is empty. Thus, add a method for that operation to replace
>
> rbtree.iter().next().is_none()
>
> This is terrible, so add a method for this purpose. We do not add a
> RBTree::len method because computing the number of elements requires
> iterating the entire tree, but checking whether it is empty can be done
> cheaply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
---
Cheers,
Benno
> ---
> rust/kernel/rbtree.rs | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rbtree: rust: add RBTree::is_empty
2025-06-16 10:36 [PATCH] rbtree: rust: add RBTree::is_empty Alice Ryhl
2025-06-17 7:30 ` Benno Lossin
@ 2025-06-29 19:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-06-29 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alice Ryhl; +Cc: Miguel Ojeda, rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 12:36 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
>
> In Rust Binder I need to be able to determine whether a red/black tree
> is empty. Thus, add a method for that operation to replace
>
> rbtree.iter().next().is_none()
>
> This is terrible, so add a method for this purpose. We do not add a
> RBTree::len method because computing the number of elements requires
> iterating the entire tree, but checking whether it is empty can be done
> cheaply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!
[ Adjusted title. - Miguel ]
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-29 19:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-16 10:36 [PATCH] rbtree: rust: add RBTree::is_empty Alice Ryhl
2025-06-17 7:30 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-29 19:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).