linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/3] rust: platform: add resource accessors
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 15:15:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBG25OQZJ18V.1W13FEOPX8MOH@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250717-topics-tyr-platform_iomem-v15-3-beca780b77e3@collabora.com>

On Thu Jul 17, 2025 at 5:55 PM CEST, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> +impl Device<Bound> {
> +    /// Returns an `IoRequest` for the resource at `index`, if any.
> +    pub fn io_request_by_index(&self, index: u32) -> Option<IoRequest<'_>> {
> +        // SAFETY: `resource` is a valid resource for `&self` during the
> +        // lifetime of the `IoRequest`.
> +        self.resource_by_index(index)
> +            .map(|resource| unsafe { IoRequest::new(self.as_ref(), resource) })

It seems there's a bug in some clippy versions we support. My regular testing
shows a warning for this with clippy 1.78:

	warning: unsafe block missing a safety comment
	   --> rust/kernel/platform.rs:275:29
	    |
	275 |             .map(|resource| unsafe { IoRequest::new(self.as_ref(), resource) })
	    |                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
	    |

However, there clearly is a safety comment.

It seems it gets confused by the multiline formatting. If I write this as

	self.resource_by_index(index)
	    // SAFETY: `resource` is a valid resource for `&self` during the
	    // lifetime of the `IoRequest`.
	    .map(|resource| unsafe { IoRequest::new(self.as_ref(), resource) })

the warning goes away.

@Miguel: What's the preferred way dealing with this? I assume we just want to
ignore this warning for the affected compiler versions?

> +    }
> +
> +    /// Returns an `IoRequest` for the resource with a given `name`, if any.
> +    pub fn io_request_by_name(&self, name: &CStr) -> Option<IoRequest<'_>> {
> +        // SAFETY: `resource` is a valid resource for `&self` during the
> +        // lifetime of the `IoRequest`.
> +        self.resource_by_name(name)
> +            .map(|resource| unsafe { IoRequest::new(self.as_ref(), resource) })
> +    }
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-19 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17 15:55 [PATCH v15 0/3] rust: platform: add Io support Daniel Almeida
2025-07-17 15:55 ` [PATCH v15 1/3] rust: io: add resource abstraction Daniel Almeida
2025-07-17 15:55 ` [PATCH v15 2/3] rust: io: mem: add a generic iomem abstraction Daniel Almeida
2025-07-17 19:45   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-18 12:23     ` Daniel Almeida
2025-07-19 13:51   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-19 14:08     ` [PATCH] rust: io: mem: enable IoRequest doc-tests Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-20 17:47       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-17 15:55 ` [PATCH v15 3/3] rust: platform: add resource accessors Daniel Almeida
2025-07-19 13:15   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-07-19 16:19     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-19 16:29       ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-19  8:01 ` [PATCH v15 0/3] rust: platform: add Io support Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-19 10:16   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-20  0:34   ` Daniel Almeida
2025-07-20 17:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-23  7:35 ` Dirk Behme
2025-07-23 13:33   ` Daniel Almeida

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBG25OQZJ18V.1W13FEOPX8MOH@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).