From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-172.mta1.migadu.com (out-172.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA4C27AC50 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 13:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755005074; cv=none; b=KV3TzobswVDU34hhwg1yS8mMph9maFT4Dljr0VHBCSBaLaLKV08seij0NNGQ/QfEltXbmxjZofWvQEJzSlCkL6OCo35/B3Ps2qqLZieAv/N8CVAjsMMR1reu7kogqhOT3/Whr/9BcRk8gqydt7/uJswZtlfDpGTcSFGS2oJErtA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755005074; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k+RzygnHtw77cY5oUC1S1yGHZ5QakgKwOCKRT3EcUfA=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=mI8XKycDO2NYhTN913fHvVv78YtmqrlQ2kzXwKIAojhDoN3BN7x4B7FLF51PbEsA4vqDpJBaJ3jDOs1GZjs9kUGu5kXIX2DeZg46Q14ldP109aY/XHepuBJ3gL+9P4lEvZ7vH1J/hVcviRJ2BfDpB7U8O3Z3KpGIn2uyWWda5gU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b=fO1COuL7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cknow.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cknow.org header.i=@cknow.org header.b="fO1COuL7" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow.org; s=key1; t=1755005066; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HT2hqwAZZG0UAbHiYEwWNljrR3mJBNDjqO64v62M4Fo=; b=fO1COuL7ORNxs3B9H3eGGgHU9jirAwVsKZdXfDYQgh+bWhrPOwnFtvbFpwFtmMrK8h7QSx G1R1zOR/S018416supYWIA/skr45GD15EDyxzwf5e02YMHZ3gWFQuWrV2108YVFoKmMHyc hbuoLiHAtfyt6ZgiYCo20JrHBiT6byXF+QYtTvctbCorhcpSW/GeEyUGP3zR/E0lWMdhHe BjWQezA7xH3eHnGuTxNraXzhvJ0fQLGcXrAI64bheWpRKS/FiWloe/KEsydGnJK9vU4bHC SXnUYbPFfsivpYnu++s2au44lOTAWHdj3xDLn+7hr1tUQUVkX9R1EGDKhsOHuw== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:23:55 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rockchip/drm: vop2: make vp registers nonvolatile X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" To: =?utf-8?q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , "Piotr Zalewski" Cc: , , , , , , , , , , References: <20250706083629.140332-2-pZ010001011111@proton.me> <4207630.fIoEIV5pvu@diego> In-Reply-To: <4207630.fIoEIV5pvu@diego> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT --72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Heiko, On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:46 PM CEST, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2025, 12:37:40 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit schr= ieb Diederik de Haas: >> On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:20 PM CEST, Piotr Zalewski wrote: >> >> With a new version of a patch, you're supposed to add the tags you >> >> received for previous versions, like my Tested-by tag [1]. >> >>=20 >> >> (unless the new version has changed so much you feel they should not = be >> >> carried over; you then need to explicitly describe that and why you >> >> dropped them) >> > =20 >> > Forgot... Should i send it as PATCH v2 RESEND? >>=20 >> I don't think that's needed; the maintainer will let you know if that's >> desirable or that they will add it (back) when committing. > > The problem is then remembering to manually collect the tags from a > previous series. > > For my reference, it was > Tested-by: Diederik de Haas > > So hopefully I'll remember now :-) and there is no need for a resend > at this time. Is more needed to get this patch accepted? If so, can I help with that? Cheers, Diederik --72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCaJtAgAAKCRDXblvOeH7b blk/AP9qVD2EKzBtPo/59n2gdL4G9t/u9M80pLQJzj/tM0PwowEA/d9FYzxx/rFZ lfZGkb8gpfOqw60ZYCxDwIfQQoqU7wQ= =3G71 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --72ec2ff28c27c182335a5ca95df6427b9de7efab639d68f403e5354ccd1f--