From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8BE2236F7; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755185898; cv=none; b=Rpm6DdBBEV2mpzjw4UKyCz+m7oNoZNRW6an/LaEMNRDvo0Ba5HTCJ8FBjTu7cDnxjyqGUCBgb0vonxinTr55Qc2MVDeoS6o1PzM9Ge8xpbd4G7dvQkRlpOo6F5HfqCO7mowR7RZRQPKjS8MNMhrlgIRpsmrIq214aBzqBbwg5Xk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755185898; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1LcIUzqAaW6zCjsY1yHCk7sVqaWkzG1WY7/GcG7KUa8=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=WPunI2jNzRxww0oyZxJ0Qx5Ef1SXE6iHHloOKCmOcDGQWruzLgn2quWDswBWiUc8BgJ4z8WW7FaIyDDGqhnSa2J8lhO2/7Coq59kqrpNlYHaB1VU8W7fPkTLx+7U/I8iL8r6lMSGhDfRXtb9uSCSZ4cq4+DOELlqUeHkg82kimM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=M+GbxeHA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M+GbxeHA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99D77C4CEF6; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755185898; bh=1LcIUzqAaW6zCjsY1yHCk7sVqaWkzG1WY7/GcG7KUa8=; h=Date:Cc:Subject:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M+GbxeHA/fwPi9Spwcg37O0nsyMZvnG1O2nkPNnteb0lvsFUzl4A24FRFAFeIYOD5 onpshTvk/UrsCJvSM4rJE3MdxlHkOx/hYMSU8T4GWiQiFqvjuHCFOuVrA4qnD3iJ47 Q+L/SJkUdqNQtY/dm6OsMovrZhuu5UtWKK4ajSpj/CJyaLXdtBsmizajvNk5iec3d4 KW8W5MwI7XGGvHBrD6I3m8zOZz0DvKc27o5OCD+QCniKM1WVDsgYyYoaAbKRS75gzF fjcSQlje2h5BlKXqkMGZVA+yIifx6/G3TvMbY3XrRc/AeABbQo1gE+PZg/XRuAunJf qOS9qCljx/IoA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:38:13 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Alice Ryhl" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Trevor Gross" , "Danilo Krummrich" , "Fiona Behrens" , "Jocelyn Falempe" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] rust: security: replace `core::mem::zeroed` with `pin_init::zeroed` From: "Benno Lossin" To: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Paul Moore" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <20250814093046.2071971-1-lossin@kernel.org> <20250814093046.2071971-8-lossin@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: On Thu Aug 14, 2025 at 5:33 PM CEST, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 5:31=E2=80=AFPM Miguel Ojeda > wrote: >> >> I think the idea is to take all these through the Rust one with > > Or through the pin-init one, which gets pulled into the Rust one. There are no pin-init changes in this patchset (in v2 there were, but I took them for v6.16), so I think it should go via the rust tree. We can of course wait with patches 3-11 until the next cycle and let maintainers pick them individually, but since they are so small, I think it's easier to just pick them all at once via the rust tree. --- Cheers, Benno