From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601F32E413 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 23:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755904447; cv=none; b=Rr7gxofiAce3mwkPT5QavSEMBKQJ556j94+1vhHtvJCdRgSQ8lKSYdPGI81AR86i5qTWDs//WsYuCNy8IeVTHDMQMkoYGYuYdUDNbgvXdVfKwQi6acGH9Sly2hC3btxnPcMe65CEv/LV3cVd6MSivbFK6RWPtPzaIrFyH8hfL3c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755904447; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FW2UlUHWBGIjYX/nRcZEwXb3PwT/VeIoEnBl3k5Bj5I=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=rDdE9KFo5FkBL0CfkgtJoTnm0RliWPPJFf8zOBebLzGJPkDFZSmX4dxO45UT5JqxsERr3ZPr01IhuYD9MC2TAhm0Hiv7Fqi/hQNAsyU+nJ0uTgkmrYVgjCcTEViR/Y0JJGeu2FOgAsDgaeWHQtbv8a5pKgZEvU9rwP26I2+IVlw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=u29cAhBs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="u29cAhBs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55D75C4CEED; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 23:14:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755904446; bh=FW2UlUHWBGIjYX/nRcZEwXb3PwT/VeIoEnBl3k5Bj5I=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=u29cAhBs+icIFmHq/CrbnR4BFguZMLeFfdShAziZuWk40Jw4Ijn2FcdgD3HgfknUV qaidWALIH5FlovLlKxft/O2Q1j/DG6G64PXYjjcQ0DOljfYPbMeF8vGCBeqKvJDjpR IIvl/rABJs0ZAgZBSuCd9Mo9yP+kaL0k9lpmN/2neiaSLY/XvMqFREs7KZWoALup5H w+P08YwTK9id1mBZyuB/jr/mJcs859WR8IMO+uFdGDPflgmZJbt/hLG4iG+cUPE8YK kFgi6QCGrIxAogGtw7fgnj9r6rc2zq1D3JSsPyd/gyxXLj0PuULVYT1Hd0PFYiLq2t jEkTroc8UNXfg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 01:14:03 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau/disp: Always accept linear modifier Cc: "Lyude Paul" , "Faith Ekstrand" , , , , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Joel Fernandes" To: "James Jones" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20250811220017.1337-1-jajones@nvidia.com> <20250811220017.1337-3-jajones@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20250811220017.1337-3-jajones@nvidia.com> On Tue Aug 12, 2025 at 12:00 AM CEST, James Jones wrote: > On some chipsets, which block-linear modifiers are > supported is format-specific. However, linear > modifiers are always be supported. The prior > modifier filtering logic was not accounting for > the linear case. > > Fixes: c586f30bf74c ("drm/nouveau/kms: Add format mod prop to base/ovly/n= vdisp") > Signed-off-by: James Jones Applied to drm-misc-fixes, thanks!