From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163B12E0417 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758715861; cv=none; b=kvnLIopGkAcZcaDzsMuFPWoonVYBwtatnbSCIqdPz7r5sJ1ggAiUUnOmJ3EbyxEwE+WFRrHfUZM1xf2VqrAmtHEEQSym5WoTlKFPp9jAP32md7c8Q8ZpapzmEKilFKLllhyDSLAXnb3NyMCaGNLWVEjRNqtnQ+sdgk3mukPMc1g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758715861; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NyeYSFx1kQDZbzJ3RfjmVhe8icCQd9sfzVXgN3YTbwk=; h=Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:From:To:References: In-Reply-To; b=Oc/Bb3/Rj3k+IBHIaTsjxgntukPUR4eMb7/2rUnrQC1v8tfOriSN+oEYgEdpqhInd+uqygQixaP+jG85rwF7Fb6vC1qV0UpvW9n19Dce4iluoRW9vc+z/JntkxqRs/p7AQwTucJ9EVaiM2dU3tsJrH8QeI9ptKH8LNYVU86Qd70= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=rvWns/an; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="rvWns/an" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20762C4CEE7; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:10:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758715860; bh=NyeYSFx1kQDZbzJ3RfjmVhe8icCQd9sfzVXgN3YTbwk=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rvWns/anr0sgMmaaqe43oMV6Kk1+Sq+6Az1SPnyj1WdJouGQXLenyRXA8UUF/0zg7 EDeCNpw8kieA7rZ4mHZCwJ70S2TCjZcT7dqwlIoglxtiHhaUrHKXNjip+2h82jcpPo oICFkGySlcCbr10IcTbcX1mjIS9Ek75FzUu+SP/LuXFhqPvUe8TSNzOcbnAjtQfX4U 5butg7sGyU/iODGVdNp0Nr9ZCm4QFEZM7nTecmDR8r4kojPwTQ6f/spJrm8htB9HPY b4O6isFawl1ZFEVNfoCnHWB4K0ccaAOEGt23yXmZHU1PHvthaApO7igqhrrwgljsxU d1p5RBy1iY9aw== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=1a5f7e5a91512f293e90383dc31ec41b3d82ae75e36c13b11b72ffba2487; micalg=pgp-sha384; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:10:56 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Drop the redundant flash info fields Cc: "Guenter Roeck" , "Pratyush Yadav" , "Cheng Ming Lin" , , , , , , , , "Maarten Zanders" From: "Michael Walle" To: "Cheng Ming Lin" , "Tudor Ambarus" X-Mailer: aerc 0.16.0 References: <20250407075400.1113177-1-linchengming884@gmail.com> <20250407075400.1113177-2-linchengming884@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --1a5f7e5a91512f293e90383dc31ec41b3d82ae75e36c13b11b72ffba2487 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > The root cause of this problem lies in the failure of parsing the SFDP > data for the flash, rather than an issue with the patch itself. I believe > we should not revert this patch. I disagree. There are Macronix flashes with that ID which doesn't have SFDP. And this patch is dropping support for them. See also [1]. Now I'm not sure it is worth reverting this commit. Nobody, except Guenter complained, but only *so far* (and that patch is in since 6.16). Any opinions? -michael [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/DD10GE4EOCD7.CPTN7198QFUV@kernel.org/=20 --1a5f7e5a91512f293e90383dc31ec41b3d82ae75e36c13b11b72ffba2487 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iKgEABMJADAWIQTIVZIcOo5wfU/AngkSJzzuPgIf+AUCaNPf0RIcbXdhbGxlQGtl cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEic87j4CH/hmpQF/fyclsXnsAeDOlfobCgo2UCFlVNWwybOt bZOJ8Yh7jm5W69/keuc/ZKcN0dxqpze+AX9Ph1IPnR1Dd76DHIy+jZBgjryCnAVO 7r0jiQ40LR/OOkdZuYUzI9NkgMZbSpmRT54= =DMTC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1a5f7e5a91512f293e90383dc31ec41b3d82ae75e36c13b11b72ffba2487--