From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Unify L1TF flushing under per-CPU variable
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:52:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DDHCMHEN3389.3KHOEVYLJY26S@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aO0pf8h8k0NddyvX@google.com>
On Mon Oct 13, 2025 at 4:31 PM UTC, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025, Brendan Jackman wrote:
>> Currently the tracking of the need to flush L1D for L1TF is tracked by
>> two bits: one per-CPU and one per-vCPU.
>>
>> The per-vCPU bit is always set when the vCPU shows up on a core, so
>> there is no interesting state that's truly per-vCPU. Indeed, this is a
>> requirement, since L1D is a part of the physical CPU.
>>
>> So simplify this by combining the two bits.
>>
>> Since this requires a DECLARE_PER_CPU() which belongs in kvm_host.h,
>
> No, it doesn't belong in kvm_host.h.
>
> One of my biggest gripes with Google's prodkernel is that we only build with one
> .config, and that breeds bad habits and some truly awful misconceptions about
> kernel programming because engineers tend to treat that one .config as gospel.
>
> Information *never* flows from a module to code that can _only_ be built-in, i.e.
> to the so called "core kernel". KVM x86 can be, and _usually_ is, built as a module,
> kvm.ko. Thus, KVM should *never* declare/provide symbols that are used by the
> core kernel, because it simply can't work (without some abusrdly stupid logic)
> when kvm.ko is built as a module:
>
> ld: vmlinux.o: in function `common_interrupt':
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:2486:(.noinstr.text+0x2b56): undefined reference to `l1tf_flush_l1d'
> ld: vmlinux.o: in function `sysvec_x86_platform_ipi':
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:2486:(.noinstr.text+0x2bf1): undefined reference to `l1tf_flush_l1d'
> ld: vmlinux.o: in function `sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi':
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:2486:(.noinstr.text+0x2c81): undefined reference to `l1tf_flush_l1d'
> ld: vmlinux.o: in function `sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi':
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:2486:(.noinstr.text+0x2cd1): undefined reference to `l1tf_flush_l1d'
> ld: vmlinux.o: in function `sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi':
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:2486:(.noinstr.text+0x2d61): undefined reference to `l1tf_flush_l1d'
> ld: vmlinux.o:arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:2486: more undefined references to `l1tf_flush_l1d' follow
>
> Because prodkernel's .config forces CONFIG_KVM=y (for equally awful reasons),
> Google engineers completely forget/miss that having information flow from kvm.ko
> to vmlinux is broken (though I am convinced that a large percentage of engineers
> that work (almost) exclusively on prodkernel simply have no clue about how kernel
> modules work in the first place).
>
> I am 100% in favor of dropping kvm_vcpu_arch.l1tf_flush_l1d, but the per-CPU flag
> needs to stay in IRQ stats. The alternative would be to have KVM (un)register a
> pointer at module (un)load, but I don't see any point in doing so. And _if_ we
> wanted to go that route, it should be done in a separate patch.
Ack, thanks for the correction. I indeed thought wrongly of kvm_host.h
as the "builtin KVM stuff" place.
I also see from the commit message of
45b575c00d8e72d69d75dd8c112f044b7b01b069 that PeterZ suggested irq_stat
should be cache-hot.
Will wait a day or two in case anyone spots other issues.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 15:20 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Unify L1TF flushing under per-CPU variable Brendan Jackman
2025-10-13 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 16:52 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2025-10-14 6:13 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-10-14 8:57 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-14 11:46 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-14 7:24 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2025-10-14 9:02 ` Brendan Jackman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DDHCMHEN3389.3KHOEVYLJY26S@google.com \
--to=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox