public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: syzbot ci <syzbot+ci693402a94575bcb2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>,  <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<jackmanb@google.com>,  <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	 <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: <syzbot@lists.linux.dev>, <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot ci] Re: KVM: x86: Unify L1TF flushing under per-CPU variable
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 08:57:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DDHX5G54GS7D.1YC8514SPRGQF@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68edea17.050a0220.91a22.01fd.GAE@google.com>

On Tue Oct 14, 2025 at 6:13 AM UTC, syzbot ci wrote:
> BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible code in x86_emulate_instruction

Ah. And now I realise I never booted my debug config on an actual
Skylake host, I'd better do that, presumably running the KVM selftests
with DEBUG_PREEMPT etc would have been enough to catch this earlier.

Anyway, I guest we just want to use vcpu->arch.last_vmentry_cpu instead
of smp_processor_id()?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-14  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-13 15:20 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Unify L1TF flushing under per-CPU variable Brendan Jackman
2025-10-13 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 16:52   ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-14  6:13 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-10-14  8:57   ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2025-10-14 11:46     ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-14  7:24 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2025-10-14  9:02   ` Brendan Jackman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DDHX5G54GS7D.1YC8514SPRGQF@google.com \
    --to=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=syzbot+ci693402a94575bcb2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox