From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Tao Zhang <tao1.zhang@intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/bugs: Use VM_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS in VMX as well
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:28:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DDVNNDVOE49L.1F77ZUNBVTR1I@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029-verw-vm-v1-1-babf9b961519@linux.intel.com>
On Wed Oct 29, 2025 at 9:26 PM UTC, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> TSA mitigation:
>
> d8010d4ba43e ("x86/bugs: Add a Transient Scheduler Attacks mitigation")
>
> introduced VM_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS for guests on AMD CPUs. Currently on Intel
> CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS is being used for guests which has a much broader scope
> (kernel->user also).
>
> Make mitigations on Intel consistent with TSA. This would help handling the
> guest-only mitigations better in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 9 +++++++--
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index d7fa03bf51b4517c12cc68e7c441f7589a4983d1..6d00a9ea7b4f28da291114a7a096b26cc129b57e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(switch_mm_cond_l1d_flush);
>
> /*
> * Controls CPU Fill buffer clear before VMenter. This is a subset of
> - * X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF, and should only be enabled when KVM-only
> + * X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM, and should only be enabled when KVM-only
> * mitigation is required.
> */
So if I understand correctly with this patch the aim is:
X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF means verw before exit to usermode
X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM means unconditional verw before VM Enter
cpu_buf_vm_clear[_mmio_only] means verw before VM Enter for
MMIO-capable guests.
Since this is being cleaned up can we also:
- Update the definition of X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF in cpufeatures.h to
say what context it applies to (now it's specifically exit to user)
- Clear up how verw_clear_cpu_buf_mitigation_selected relates to these
two flags. Thinking aloud here... it looks like this is set:
- If MDS mitigations are on, meaning both flags are set
- If TAA mitigations are on, meaning both flags are set
- If MMIO mitigations are on, and the CPU has MDS or TAA. In this case
both flags are set, but this causality is messier.
- If RFDS mitigations are on and supported, meaning both flags are set
So if I'm reading this correctly whenever
verw_clear_cpu_buf_mitigation_selected we should expect both flags
enabled. So I think all that's needed is to add a reference to
X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM to the comment?
I think we also need to update the assertion of vmx->disable_fb_clear?
Anyway thanks this seems like a very clear improvement to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 21:26 [PATCH 0/3] Unify VERW mitigation for guests Pawan Gupta
2025-10-29 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/bugs: Use VM_CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS in VMX as well Pawan Gupta
2025-10-29 22:13 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 12:28 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2025-10-30 18:43 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-31 11:25 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-29 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/mmio: Rename cpu_buf_vm_clear to cpu_buf_vm_clear_mmio_only Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-30 5:40 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 12:29 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-30 16:56 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-29 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/mmio: Unify VERW mitigation for guests Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 0:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-30 6:11 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 0:33 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 5:52 ` Yao Yuan
2025-10-30 6:17 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 12:52 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-30 16:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-30 16:26 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-10-30 18:06 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 17:54 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 17:28 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 18:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-30 19:11 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-10-30 0:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Sean Christopherson
2025-10-30 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DDVNNDVOE49L.1F77ZUNBVTR1I@google.com \
--to=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tao1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox