On Fri Nov 21, 2025 at 9:10 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2025 08:42, Michael Walle wrote:
>> On Thu Nov 20, 2025 at 2:51 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/11/2025 08:55, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>> The Kontron SMARC-sAM67 module needs the TPS6594 regulator driver to
>>>> boot from SD card, i.e. for its root filesystem.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Arnd, the PR from TI [1] (which contains the device trees for this
>>>> board) is already out, so I'm sending this to the soc ML directly. 
>>>> Let me know if this can still be applied, if not, I'll have to wait
>>>> for the next window.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why it cannot go via TI tree? It should...
>> 
>> As explained above it can of course, but I've missed the time window
>> as the PR from the TI tree to the soc tree was already sent out.
>
> This alone would justify for anyone to send directly to soc@ when they
> miss their upstream maintainer timeframes, so sorry, but that's the way.

Fair point. Sorry for the noise.

-michael

> Time window in TI can still take it. If they cannot, then for sure soc@
> cannot, because soc@ takes from TI.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof