From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [FYI PATCH 0/7] Mitigation for CVE-2018-12207
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:10:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DEF550EE-F476-48FB-A226-66D34503CF70@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573593697-25061-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
> On Nov 12, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> CVE-2018-12207 is a microarchitectural implementation issue
> that could allow an unprivileged local attacker to cause system wide
> denial-of-service condition.
>
> Privileged software may change the page size (ex. 4KB, 2MB, 1GB) in the
> paging structures, without following such paging structure changes with
> invalidation of the TLB entries corresponding to the changed pages. In
> this case, the attacker could invoke instruction fetch, which will result
> in the processor hitting multiple TLB entries, reporting a machine check
> error exception, and ultimately hanging the system.
>
> The attached patches mitigate the vulnerability by making huge pages
> non-executable. The processor will not be able to execute an instruction
> residing in a large page (ie. 2MB, 1GB, etc.) without causing a trap into
> the host kernel/hypervisor; KVM will then break the large page into 4KB
> pages and gives executable permission to 4KB pages.
It sounds that this mitigation will trigger the “page fracturing” problem
I once encountered [1], causing frequent full TLB flushes when invlpg
runs. I wonder if VMs would benefit in performance from changing
/sys/kernel/debug/x86/tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling to zero.
On a different note - I am not sure I fully understand the exact scenario.
Any chance of getting a kvm-unit-test for this case?
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9099311/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 21:21 [FYI PATCH 0/7] Mitigation for CVE-2018-12207 Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/bugs: Add ITLB_MULTIHIT bug infrastructure Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/cpu: Add Tremont to the cpu vulnerability whitelist Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpu/speculation: Uninline and export CPU mitigations helpers Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] kvm: mmu: ITLB_MULTIHIT mitigation Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] kvm: Add helper function for creating VM worker threads Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] kvm: x86: mmu: Recovery of shattered NX large pages Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-12 21:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation: Add ITLB_MULTIHIT documentation Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-13 6:38 ` [FYI PATCH 0/7] Mitigation for CVE-2018-12207 Jan Kiszka
2019-11-13 8:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-13 21:24 ` Dave Hansen
2019-11-14 1:17 ` Nadav Amit
2019-11-14 5:26 ` Dave Hansen
2019-11-14 6:02 ` Nadav Amit
2019-11-15 2:11 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-11-14 8:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-11-18 13:58 ` Ralf Ramsauer
2020-01-21 18:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-01-21 18:25 ` Dave Hansen
2019-11-13 23:25 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-11-14 8:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-11-15 2:23 ` Pawan Gupta
2019-11-13 13:00 ` Jinpu Wang
2019-11-13 14:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-13 18:10 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
2019-11-13 18:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DEF550EE-F476-48FB-A226-66D34503CF70@gmail.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox