From: "Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
"Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@chromium.org>,
"Antoniu Miclaus" <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>,
"Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@chromium.org>,
"Shrikant Raskar" <raskar.shree97@gmail.com>,
"Per-Daniel Olsson" <perdaniel.olsson@axis.com>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() return semantics
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:27:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DEPLXUZ8UPY9.38K72YVMTF84W@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9562673ef83dd73b6092b5a7d2042b380a55700c.camel@gmail.com>
On Thu Dec 4, 2025 at 9:23 AM -05, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 14:18 -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
>> In order to improve API consistency with conditional locks, use
>> true/false return semantics in iio_device_claim_buffer_mode().
>>
>> This also matches iio_device_claim_direct() return semantics.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Even if the rest gets a NACK, I think at least this patch makes sense. In fact I
> would even extend it so that we have the same inline API with proper annotations:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18/source/include/linux/iio/iio.h#L679
>
> So it really has the same semantics as iio_device_claim_direct()
I agree. I will include that here and just call it match semantics.
>
> - Nuno Sá
--
~ Kurt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-03 19:18 [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() return semantics Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:23 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04 17:27 ` Kurt Borja [this message]
2025-12-06 18:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() naming Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:50 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:35 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] iio: core: Add cleanup.h support for iio_device_claim_*() Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:50 ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 22:34 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:18 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 17:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-06 20:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-07 16:00 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] iio: light: vcnl4000: Use cleanup.h for IIO locks Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 22:19 ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] iio: health: max30102: " Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:52 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:07 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 17:35 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:47 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] iio: light: opt4060: " Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 22:40 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:23 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:42 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 17:31 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:36 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 15:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 16:00 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-09 10:34 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-09 17:05 ` David Lechner
2025-12-10 9:17 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-10 18:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04 17:33 ` Kurt Borja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DEPLXUZ8UPY9.38K72YVMTF84W@gmail.com \
--to=kuurtb@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=perdaniel.olsson@axis.com \
--cc=raskar.shree97@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox