From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-vs1-f43.google.com (mail-vs1-f43.google.com [209.85.217.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23D07322C60 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2025 18:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.217.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766861080; cv=none; b=H62jiRqgdsSuJK+t58wpsFMjqbyGMJrhHbYQNfpDw2Uw/+gLN0dZ5LVgUEv/0d+2YwqhhTmhZ73irADzDfZUCLodLHBD3eaM45tI52PZkInpMAtIPVRzQlLGpe4PmmT/ouzLxowTEXZSrLV4ArcZAe15WMNbaQEnyRkOz+pU0u8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766861080; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rdhIBTfFdXUktQ9sa/Bcoyf0GMkDmxm1f+vi1Bd9iOU=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=DCYcsFDxqEeRIxhK7m6Uq52fi+hk+AOF+fVZGS0+zm8KmW5S6G+UJjPWZfy0/p4qr2nOUf44awXA5thJ3RpeUsYOrDpUsOhA3ww2IsV9CRZ/B4n6h6KbeAV+XWDOa4ni3SLl4UTGN9nW5tuPT9QYfm22Q2U5AQ2hd/Vd4bpJtc8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=WSOokB+9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.217.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WSOokB+9" Received: by mail-vs1-f43.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-5e9d2ce037aso6088005137.0 for ; Sat, 27 Dec 2025 10:44:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1766861078; x=1767465878; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=L7kO+jmMKH7V5UQhMAssLbKi2imCsali/qeRnKC3XxI=; b=WSOokB+9XvdLvBTsJxRhw2m3F7vqAL0+EfKQhMaam4FRKK0DxkiD118gwH/ERy5xc1 ZpJQK52nb6l+mWEY62sPbP9fQ06tJ/mD+ChCO8RvS56R2B2IT+MY7zTYTyi5oGD8A5FX sWJ9v+abOt27Iz0lwou7qMfy+YC+xnYTXwjgpoUcjiw4ouWoaRq9SllvpIYeSb7NFYus gd7wN2isosVVc1gHCgnJfQxsvXQHUPvNBhDNpIaeRivhOzadwcshbskXeQynLcB6zT8C REL+NRxjcgNVBIo0CvbYxK9LmP5B7XcDIgQiNc/sf/FYUJNMJG9CmutQNqO3kNDiXuji SRzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1766861078; x=1767465878; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=L7kO+jmMKH7V5UQhMAssLbKi2imCsali/qeRnKC3XxI=; b=XpIV9PlQ7iJ1EZkjMh3Umz2qGh4aJNABm0kOkbHky8Ox8+wUkq4Fup04ur+ZU5zeE+ huT27QFiZ0rCcqgl4LwgjwA+vSYL+kKQrVN+GrSe8tsjzvTQe99mQoSwmCaOsC/2AmYX GbdQ0SczhiW519MUqZ7xRFo67cEaEP6Yd5xTVUs/ITquEQcI3cKGCpOFrc6ygbPCHjOb feqac36jaitFdtbfi0RQ00ZNB/Lvyz1GJao4WUC4NdUa2bgDxp4+mNmQToZaQdDdFsFB zVT9LrUiSMqZ9Y5g8x29RdktDPJAuU8Q0kHO0GrNe8dC7U4A8ZO+wtnlupEC6TIRwqDe uYyQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWytNRduh4nbxStG8kkJLHuh0lkTkuwza4OArlQUixHWFikHspmrSvC3eymbquYa6bSGldcEBOGRzjVRIA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyRCCxtRfibRpPGR7bKjrGKLYvEJvDvCYsEY4gKjC7ITVeu3MN2 J1mcCKFgO1yNDuiB73lfT6zv6LjFBEHPx0jdcbN9tuhjMFeEoRKg3PhC X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX4x6mWLF7Oy7RYwVIQ6Kvq99Ab/bfVzkLGfGr2MSgsSNpCFMWzm4obK3nVbB56 ukrhFzIRKH330IJgkGcWdni0ZMZebxbccV2+geBf411fMlMX19LLqcBo3c8MsRI/onV4jX5j8jf iF0XNBscnv1MDHOn+D+RauGzsEnk+CSxAajHVugvGX0QHoMl6aab/mWPpHEYBX3ZYITxoEa+l7h vfq8X6imnlPe8Jpvep44pf7KhLSsug1qr5acw1JpzlW7J3pR8NLWq/oSFOOjtrliYEb48HqwkaU K9lemGO/G+ssykHZUZj32Y0Rmp0HCe4KS2hW422xfGJyDae3+TXjfTLIXAWN9GU5W9yXFcr0jxS BkEIVObLCXmH5+oXGA4Js7EM2fROSDLQoYo2HOsx44B1NfGmR0ZjwVWA7At81Xe8jxQbJLMZoEU ipGvNs0m8yzGc3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEZcQ/IcoUf7aH/caNcZC+d2KO1dJbj+QLlr65L47GvTlxUk1imjM7pKXq3ZG6lkoTMvo/JAA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2c81:b0:5db:deb6:b261 with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-5eb1a687a81mr8750016137.13.1766861078123; Sat, 27 Dec 2025 10:44:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2800:bf0:82:11a2:7ac4:1f2:947b:2b6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ada2fe7eead31-5eb1aa4f32dsm8215153137.3.2025.12.27.10.44.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Dec 2025 10:44:37 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 13:44:35 -0500 Message-Id: Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" , "Lars-Peter Clausen" , "Michael Hennerich" , "Benson Leung" , "Antoniu Miclaus" , "Gwendal Grignou" , "Shrikant Raskar" , "Per-Daniel Olsson" , =?utf-8?q?Nuno_S=C3=A1?= , "Andy Shevchenko" , "Guenter Roeck" , "Jonathan Cameron" , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() semantics and implementation From: "Kurt Borja" To: "David Lechner" , "Kurt Borja" , "Jonathan Cameron" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20251211-lock-impr-v2-0-6fb47bdaaf24@gmail.com> <20251211-lock-impr-v2-3-6fb47bdaaf24@gmail.com> <20251227144707.1bebcf27@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: On Sat Dec 27, 2025 at 1:24 PM -05, David Lechner wrote: > On 12/27/25 12:14 PM, Kurt Borja wrote: >> On Sat Dec 27, 2025 at 9:47 AM -05, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 21:45:21 -0500 >>> Kurt Borja wrote: >>> > > ... > >>> Given earlier discussion about this one being rather more tricky >>> to name than the claim_direct because claim_buffer sounds like >>> we are grabbing the buffer, I'm not sure on the best naming to have >>> here. iio_device_claim_buffer_m maybe? Ugly though and >>> these are super rare so maybe this isn't a particularly major >>> concern. >>=20 >> Yes, it's a bit ugly, but as I proposed in the cover letter, if we go >> for a full API rename, it shouldn't matter for now? >>=20 >> What do you think about that? >>=20 >> I'll go for iio_device_claim_buffer_m() if I can't think of something >> better. > > iio_device_try_claim_buffer_mode()? > Yes, that's better. --=20 ~ Kurt