From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCAC533893D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767955456; cv=none; b=izpaksNJRM12tUYDU23i1EyNm60pwqxb7LO6ItISuVoyuPd2aqt/Nj687nxkZ6di0ESi7Uai9DZ3KWxg/YhzEL7iC+e169AIzQVw8oi6ENTrORXlifh2zmprHR1pucdG8I7gyGF9OUeYBgeAwDjJFsrUDcVnuOWaWIdyseexoys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767955456; c=relaxed/simple; bh=heRUsgtR8J5gfVgo3v5KkSNHlF4BfjCnFvshhBUlf0c=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Cc:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=nCxI1C/kbgUROtf68eTTUFoC9gf60EK2ImBP1jltTsdQrEv0ZgqZ923lvfwxn2v3ZHLovJACrHQdZoKVX4TSrqL6SvVn8qWMscYo/vKRnxekCG01MVtEDn3ac6354fvZS9+1ml2b/T+DZam7ci5se5fbRUAKVEkygXNxFBqPcNA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=CHHVmWab; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="CHHVmWab" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D95C1F6D3; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E132160734; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 10:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 81CCF103C88D6; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 11:43:58 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1767955445; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=SiCIIDZ8DQ4eVHwh0jh/RzqDH1KSvakfkkduuvCNYtk=; b=CHHVmWabxW4J/FmEQWQbUQcLH8cRIxzAgak+rlrLVxhBB2O5qUMp+0aTrZYpUZwDEM2+k0 4y3Pq+0kpPbv3sEh0MQO68+EKWWON4m3vFnbhSeAfcEEskuzDo6oKvKTvr3ItBGPbchM2b 6iopx7goSrbT2ijmFwt27qimHfFzTsgWNNhEoAKS/4YyyMZhk73zlTXB5jrgbXS//0Jdee sx6pS0gYykrS3erWjnqH64b2J1cmOGYPQ3/LMT3yKQQ3gd8HUm4pICNfR5iOtUMblWVHIz LicE7Ye8j8vmLi6pipJmBpcPYwmdDo2RBgVA0SvgJNBTZDOG8JcDnxvvjFnkJA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:43:57 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Luca Ceresoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] drm/bridge: add of_drm_find_and_get_bridge() and a managed *next_bridge, deprecate of_drm_find_bridge() Cc: "Hui Pu" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , , , , To: "Liu Ying" , "Andrzej Hajda" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Robert Foss" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Shawn Guo" , "Sascha Hauer" , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , "Fabio Estevam" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <20260107-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_of_find_bridge-v4-0-a62b4399a6bf@bootlin.com> <7d937ad1-dd7c-4a68-9af7-f386ca2c27dc@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <7d937ad1-dd7c-4a68-9af7-f386ca2c27dc@nxp.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Liu, On Fri Jan 9, 2026 at 10:53 AM CET, Liu Ying wrote: > > > On 1/7/26 17:56, Luca Ceresoli wrote: >> This v4 contains the leftovers of the v3 series that deprecated >> of_drm_find_bridge(), added a replacement which handles bridge refcounti= ng, >> and converted some of the direct users. All patches have been applied >> except the imx8qxp-pixel-link ones, which still need a review for the fi= rst >> patch. >> >> @Liu, patch 1 is waiting for a review and it's non-trivial, it would be >> nice if you could have a look at that one at least. > > Luca, I'v been too busy recently for tasks assigned by my employer to > give an in-time review, sorry about that. I'll try to review this late > next week if not sooner. That would be great, thanks! And I understand, aren't we all busy? :) I have resent as v4 just to ensure it's clear that these patches are not yet applied. My e-mail [0] might have suggested the opposite, due to my total noobness in using the b4 auto-thankanator, sorry if that was the case. Having patch 1 reviewed is the most important thing here. Other patches are already reviewed by Maxime, so your review would of course be very useful but not strictly necessary for this series to go forward. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/176708623356.127863.8623917477288453126.b4= -ty@bootlin.com/ Best regards, Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com