From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Gui-Dong Han" <hanguidong02@gmail.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>,
"Qiu-ji Chen" <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>, <Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] driver core: enforce device_lock for driver_match_device()
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 19:36:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DFTMTT15FX2W.3U49GQ0UMDWJ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ec6cf46-990e-489c-836e-49124034b67f@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue Jan 20, 2026 at 6:38 PM CET, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
>> I don't have a machine to reproduce it, but for debugging it would probably help
>> to not actually take the lock in __driver_attach(), but only acquire / release
>> the corresponding lockdep map. If my suspicion is correct, we should see a
>> lockdep splat pointing out the issue.
>
> I tried lockdep but didn't see anything different. Instrumenting with
> printk() tells me it's deadlocking trying to attach arm-smmu on Juno
> (that's a v1 SMMU on this platform), I'll try to poke further but it'll
> likely be tomorrow at the earliest.
Maybe the following diff faking the lock for lockdep helps, as it should keep
things running, i.e. with this we have the exact same semantics as if we'd
revert the patch (except for the lockdep check of course).
diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
index 677320881af1..4741412d7e46 100644
--- a/drivers/base/base.h
+++ b/drivers/base/base.h
@@ -190,8 +190,13 @@ static inline int driver_match_device(const struct device_driver *drv,
static inline int driver_match_device_locked(const struct device_driver *drv,
struct device *dev)
{
- guard(device)(dev);
- return driver_match_device(drv, dev);
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_acquire(&dev->mutex.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
+ ret = driver_match_device(drv, dev);
+ mutex_release(&dev->mutex.dep_map, _THIS_IP_);
+
+ return ret;
}
static inline void dev_sync_state(struct device *dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-20 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-13 16:28 [PATCH v5] driver core: enforce device_lock for driver_match_device() Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-13 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-01-13 19:23 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-16 7:34 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-16 11:19 ` Greg KH
2026-01-16 11:38 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-16 11:54 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-20 13:22 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-20 13:30 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-20 13:48 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-20 14:05 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-21 8:55 ` Wang Jiayue
2026-01-21 8:57 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-21 10:40 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 11:02 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 11:19 ` Greg KH
2026-01-21 12:49 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-21 12:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 13:02 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-21 14:07 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 13:03 ` Robin Murphy
2026-01-21 14:13 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 13:22 ` Jiayue Wang
2026-01-20 15:03 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-20 15:35 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-20 17:38 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-20 18:36 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-01-20 20:05 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-20 21:18 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 1:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 7:18 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-21 7:41 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-21 7:56 ` Greg KH
2026-01-21 8:12 ` Greg KH
2026-01-21 9:54 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-21 10:30 ` Greg KH
2026-01-20 15:23 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-20 15:27 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-21 20:00 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-21 21:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-22 17:28 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-22 17:55 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-22 18:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-22 18:58 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-22 19:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-23 13:57 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-23 14:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-23 14:29 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-23 16:54 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-23 18:53 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-23 19:07 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-27 14:58 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-27 15:18 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-27 14:53 ` Jon Hunter
2026-01-27 15:05 ` Gui-Dong Han
2026-01-21 7:40 ` David Heidelberg
2026-02-11 10:42 ` Alexander Stein
2026-02-11 13:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-25 20:19 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-25 20:38 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-26 8:54 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2026-02-26 11:15 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-26 12:21 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DFTMTT15FX2W.3U49GQ0UMDWJ@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chenqiuji666@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hanguidong02@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox