Re: [PATCH 6/6] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: move sysroot crates to sysroot_project

["Jesung Yang" <y.j3ms.n@gmail.com>]

On Thu Jan 22, 2026 at 6:23 PM KST, Eliot Courtney wrote:
> On Wed Jan 21, 2026 at 9:01 AM JST, Jesung Yang wrote:
>> I still think the versioning infrastructure is a prerequisite as we're
>> using the `sysroot_src` field here.
>>
>> If we specify `sysroot_src` without `crate_attrs = ["no_std"]`,
>> rust-analyzer treats `std` as a dependency for all local crates by
>> default. Consequently, any rust-analyzer version lacking `crate_attrs`
>> support (which silently ignores `crate_attrs = ["no_std"]`) would
>> incorrectly assume an implicit `std` dependency for all kernel modules.
>> Having the versioning infrastructure first allows us to handle this
>> transition without breaking the user experience for those on older
>> toolchains.
> Yeah, I agree that specifying sysroot_src by itself includes std and that
> is potentially an issue.
>
> But, currently due to issues like the relative #[path] include, the
> sysroot crates aren't really processable very well by rust-analyzer
> causing a lot of spurious errors and unresolved symbols, which make
> using the LSP experience pretty bad IMO. OTOH, while the sysroot_src
> approach does include std, it at least makes it usable. Personally I
> find it more useful this way, but I can see the argument for both sides.

So the problem here is that the versioning infrastructure effectively
restricts the use of `sysroot_src` for older rust-analyzer versions
that do not support `crate_attrs`, which leads to yet another bad
experience. Hmm... I would like to hear others' thoughts on this
trade-off, since I don't have a perfect solution at the moment.

> Tangential, but I'm not sure why the drivers don't specify no_std
> themselves - then we wouldn't have to worry about this IIUC.

Perhaps Miguel could chime in and give some details about this, but
you can find a bit of context here [1].

On a separate note: I actually have a previous effort covering
`sysroot_src` and `crate_attrs` [2] that I'd like to land first. It
covers almost the same ground as your 6th patch (minus the
`sysroot_project` use). Since I wrote the `crate-attrs` code in
rust-analyzer itself specifically to improve its usability in the
kernel, I'm hoping to finish the full story on the kernel side. Would
you be open to that?

Thanks!

[1] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/x/topic/x/near/561668361
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20260101-ra-fix-primitive-v1-1-def809357b4e@gmail.com/

Best regards,
Jesung