Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX

["Julian Ruess" <julianr@linux.ibm.com>]

On Thu Jan 22, 2026 at 8:44 PM CET, Farhan Ali wrote:
> We are configuring the error signaling on the vast majority of devices and
> it's extremely rare that it fires anyway. This allows userspace to be
> notified on errors for legacy PCI devices. The Internal Shared Memory (ISM)
> device on s390x is one such device. For PCI devices on IBM s390x error
> recovery involves platform firmware and notification to operating system
> is done by architecture specific way. So the ISM device can still be
> recovered when notified of an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c  | 8 ++------
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> index c92c6c512b24..9d44df9e21db 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
> @@ -778,8 +778,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_irq_count(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int irq_typ
>  			return (flags & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE) + 1;
>  		}
>  	} else if (irq_type == VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX) {
> -		if (pci_is_pcie(vdev->pdev))

I'm wondering why this pci_is_pcie was introduced here in the first place.
Do you have any ideas?

-- snip --