From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16F7A31AF3B; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769619953; cv=none; b=j4JNd+TAnK1mdYUTAUIrrSQSoOdgnr8hhjmqAgU6kfOlwJbHs2+X6rDzWB2PH2QwCa+hhFSThvd0l0PMhPhgApKPVVB166BT9aOEqzw/Riyh4Ubiee8JmAwd+7nRFnFGSwcQny4tLJ71EpiWkEnS5fCAfW/bFzifLd80XojZ/4c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769619953; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pV5znxiIcfTIztliUZShvIKzU7Zae2v8PCdn/amDaKQ=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=SWd/2dOisW7ohdCCmHt45w6TbP+YZtgj9yhlL8o55hNLOFMyx7cpoSL6gCrkMG7pwuUqgOLu5tryD9IwIVezwqx2tPYA/xM7A3lVNet1YtXNWcDKXCtGXHW6N52swFkoePXFX6/oOZo8gjcJ1Qt4asTDqKBviOoFBQkcCzjDa5o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=j0+1eSNc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j0+1eSNc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70493C4CEF1; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:05:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769619952; bh=pV5znxiIcfTIztliUZShvIKzU7Zae2v8PCdn/amDaKQ=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=j0+1eSNchx/E61Ue/Zc3V4Tmrsn+SxiRc1p5BGLkLNdH3QNu8zX3YE2MRhX2fnHH5 hNY4t02mOEWYpmVzUHsLIik/MNVRskFf76YgxcKJWTkHFKsQnBVyBRstd7dJ9vuVxs OSlK0MQy0tDD/yFCYRsEDWjTCBr0ubwm8pkpZZL2Yec7DONnaAL8mN1qD3D7RysEhB cLDsEpa5lQvS5y5QQMBwHHi3Pft+ccbslwLN8n5nDqiUDwoChkyRUqsfcGoG7PMigP rNqUX6ZgkgZJUU2f6N8Azo+5vB1jyl5brOtZqQIujy+36oBKyU0e0Mt6phuLobLybl 2EQDSgKVtn9hQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:05:47 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Rust pin-init for v7.0 From: "Benno Lossin" To: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Gary Guo" Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Danilo Krummrich" , "Fiona Behrens" , "Christian Schrefl" , "Tamir Duberstein" , "Alban Kurti" , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260122101027.1427972-1-lossin@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: On Wed Jan 28, 2026 at 4:03 PM CET, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:10=E2=80=AFAM Benno Lossin = wrote: >> >> Hi Miguel, >> >> Lot's of changes in this one, mainly the `syn` rewrite, but also some >> smaller changes such as removing the `try_` versions of the macros in >> pin-init (the kernel still declares its own). >> >> All commits have been in linux-next since Monday. >> >> The first commit in my tree is also in the `syn` patch series from Gary >> [1], to avoid problems it should be merged after this tag. There also is >> a "phantom conflict" with 74e15ac34b098 ("scripts: >> generate_rust_analyzer: Add pin_init_internal deps") in rust-fixes, >> which you already saw in linux-next [2]. Otherwise no conflicts >> expected. >> >> Please pull for v7.0 -- thanks! > > Merged into `rust-next` and Gary's series (without his first patch) > right after that -- thank you! > > By the way, in the PR message, it would be nice if you could use the > imperative, since that is nowadays the style maintainers should use > for PRs. Will do! > I reworded it a bit to conform, please take a look. Changes look good to me. Cheers, Benno