From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BADC8234964; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769628418; cv=none; b=agNhdnUxUDtjHqUwAtXJqtwJlK3DP60cyQ+0ml8f2kSmIf1zHyx0iCo3EmlHDzXJ814AS2+Ry1ypsjLsjUhhOELWDuM3jeAg4mkXfg/ppRkpEiMu46GfxYM1Tu4XiFhBiGw97BoTu4Ql7mhd7Ul32BOmvzuEGWrxMXMazC+dhHY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769628418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TzV4pN7PRtR1UEKT5f/yZZLm0hl7atb4Md8C61oAa0k=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=AicrrcGWtcQrLSiYRY3q6HdiBYM4um3jJ6J4qAjgR156FL16oWElaTAUfFSS6BTeWHacs3pq+Jdqm/z84iRrt/Oa8Oje5Xm6mt4JuqTPJ3lAy8jEV2sCdqAcywfLt3hiIQ/5bHM2DVjhSgAwaoKYnbgNNfxVgaDuvtlcXL57y3s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ELD4D4oX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ELD4D4oX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BA3FC4CEF1; Wed, 28 Jan 2026 19:26:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769628418; bh=TzV4pN7PRtR1UEKT5f/yZZLm0hl7atb4Md8C61oAa0k=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ELD4D4oXJN//Zhj64ZhnVZsx2Q+soZTAAGbXiKIVrr4h7XNzbU+rGkHICpacU7oeO ld5iX+kSEfAjP4/swuXMGwM3KlSeKKl/V62RSuKF5shxh08UDlk0014KitQAxSsVEL FnsuEBJWY3xgKu3x1ZBPHyutwu0Xd6hIKMmA/0DPgGZsMtE2ADIw6aqhsrYrdymzQr VA0ih79k0yhKFuZ+YqFLSslj5LRxnfxqnBrcTYe8hfZenYKH/Lkj+frjtPVd2wseK6 LHFkbcokjk1Zgb/V54wZHsBMuOyzU4ig1Ug/RvRp0t/oeTQnH9IK9J8rwufEDaAhsp Ez6WBXYjFHDNA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 20:26:53 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: alloc: add GFP_NOIO flag Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Lorenzo Stoakes" , "Vlastimil Babka" , "Liam R. Howlett" , "Uladzislau Rezki" , , To: "Andreas Hindborg" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260128-gfp-noio-v1-1-9a808fc49b44@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260128-gfp-noio-v1-1-9a808fc49b44@kernel.org> On Wed Jan 28, 2026 at 7:37 PM CET, Andreas Hindborg wrote: > + /// [`GFP_NOIO`] will use direct reclaim to discard clean pages or s= lab > + /// pages that do not require the starting of any physical IO. > + pub const GFP_NOIO: Flags =3D Flags(bindings::GFP_NOIO); How do you use this? What about abstractions for memalloc_noio_{save,restor= e}() instead?