Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pin-init: internal: init: remove `#[disable_initialized_field_access]`

["Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>]

On Wed Mar 4, 2026 at 1:26 PM CET, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 8:00 AM Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> I figured that we can't really "close" a Zulip topic (we can mark it as
>> completed, but that topic was originally about the field accessors, so
>> not sure if this makes much sense.
>
> Using Link: instead of Closes: is supposed to mean that only part of
> the issue is fixed, i.e. whether you can "technically close" it or not
> is not important (e.g. Closes: to an archive like lore.kernel.org are
> very common and actually what the docs mention as the first use case).
>
> So I would say Closes: should be the "default", and Link: is for
> particular cases where an actual issue (or message) carries several
> topics and could be confusing to have several commits with the exact
> same Closes: line.
>
> In the case of Zulip, we can link to particular messages in a single
> thread, so typically it is possible to use Closes:, though the current
> UI isn't great to see where exactly it was linked to... :(
>
> Anyway, I guess the inspiration was the similar feature from forges,
> and perhaps in case someone has a custom tracking system that actually
> auto-closes things in a forge, but it is a bit confusing. Having
> allowed "# ..." for Closes: or a similar Closes(foo): instead of
> reusing Link: may have been better.
>
> I hope that helps!

Yeah that explains it, thanks!

In that case you can make it a closes tag when picking.

Cheers,
Benno