From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Tiezhu Yang" <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Hengqi Chen" <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Cc: <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add alignment flag for test_verifier 190 testcase
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:57:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DH02RVPTQ78K.3CPL9LSSI6IIO@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310064507.4228-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
On Tue Mar 10, 2026 at 2:45 AM EDT, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> There exists failure when executing the testcase "./test_verifier 190" if
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is not set on LoongArch.
>
> #190/p calls: two calls that return map_value with incorrect bool check FAIL
> ...
> misaligned access off (0x0; 0xffffffffffffffff)+0 size 8
> ...
> Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
>
> It means that the program has unaligned accesses, but the kernel sets
> CONFIG_ARCH_STRICT_ALIGN by default to enable -mstrict-align to prevent
> unaligned accesses, so add a flag F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> into the testcase to avoid the failure.
>
> This is somehow similar with the commit ce1f289f541e ("selftests/bpf:
> Add F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to some tests").
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> index 86887130a0ef..29e57f0e56c3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> @@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@
> .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'",
> .result_unpriv = REJECT,
> .errstr_unpriv = "invalid read from stack R7 off=-16 size=8",
> + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
> },
> {
> "calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test1",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 6:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] Modify some code about test_verifier Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-10 6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] selftests/bpf: Check alignment flag if expected result is REJECT Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-11 15:56 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-12 6:59 ` Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-12 9:29 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 11:06 ` Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-16 13:04 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-17 1:56 ` Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-11 16:11 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-10 6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add alignment flag for test_verifier 190 testcase Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-11 15:57 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-03-11 16:13 ` Paul Chaignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DH02RVPTQ78K.3CPL9LSSI6IIO@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hengqi.chen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox