From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352A3258CD9 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 02:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775096383; cv=none; b=eljvadLvYcJr7KIcMCer0dN7Aitmh6bhsr9slFycD9VnbMmvfnanBMHwhgeSBxu1ij6xTw3Rh3XVOzmYVajJwlevC48F9jrRXpUrK7aH7B6j7NQw98iAoAcHLJX+dd5cwlo1sMQ50/WyRA133gW9tHtfgWsH6tNPC94s4Zh4wjU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775096383; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HYGP2hISTZIOwm7KcS+DDptEEs44HrRNLaMy7aCvf7A=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=VQSafLLBiskhSgy6tUhpRM6v+lZ/Eo/x61CN0gkGYM4bzmSan/hyBvuHuulSzd0FCFbMbamqTfkZ3G5hvL47HohLY6KAzHKy745riRdtxf5b/kapna8yM4KB4aRJdpUkUmaUfjRudf+Iv82YpOSKi1ryisafxILUeIlZaG3wJvU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=GAPMwA4f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="GAPMwA4f" Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43d0deb7ad5so344363f8f.2 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1775096380; x=1775701180; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=HYGP2hISTZIOwm7KcS+DDptEEs44HrRNLaMy7aCvf7A=; b=GAPMwA4fGw5vhwXgL138EKOPqA9xLfPo3PLJuDSG1bMAgMWCsVP31Ky3rH6wM1UbaB bSlcPv3PQYr5bVLaeeA1vjLH1R7oIjnzIkBaXmzwnmSj1uXSpj3jcd7J2jdpKgpbnVmW TPi+6nF3Azh1UhCIBx2oOCLHZQke83U1+kNRa4pDgvPKHZlaMyTScpq9N0sLtpZ1NwW8 3LpM8cGzxH0sK7dcfdbv/N1s1usnkPnAJR4fCppGYQJC8kz7SFUH+Nkkme5ciWpT7ICZ 2T944cIwhqVlkmOAbBFEhlNgu1X9X6NdZ+ywfPNOcj1LAJ5OuwrwW7VSxeY9PnspOj/x luYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775096380; x=1775701180; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HYGP2hISTZIOwm7KcS+DDptEEs44HrRNLaMy7aCvf7A=; b=kVCDWvg7AGoCPoC+R/43FIEi39U8s653WpxJPmsCt7JPuBsdg27dkpfoJGYzlHPM9P LGQ/J2QlwgEOhLdv0s8TWPpePS2FT2M/FjAWqpEqkj1Lvep+UcFRqKFYIGGxY3TDDXUN pcDDZstUqTSkcK1VWT+990MEGJB2qVi9ZBHtwKaM/sRBPkzu1F496OdQdzo8UnvHCs6E YUPet9EGQn7ODUvg36xqQMSULK6AcxjDMqph/Wr9CBZMK1pafRKMTRTKItym8NvBmaFv tmTsWV113M6R8VOKrt3aLqH2ae+NjvCHJP83Gi69ZTJowFzuvSuIh9tyH14XJ+OdOK+6 1zKA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU7WhAcmZpJWKFnufTRHY4RpDW4xuSU7K6D8MLyb4swYMyGMOh8ZaEGk0W3No1LyYRQxAZd3XUrqysB8bQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+f/eYxnmKl/ackr3Ly+EAZUwmF8+vdro8cJ+kjrPkA8M7rzjm VDU2wzIBrunII5PEpa0px5qJGfhEZfW3cr6BHdFJe/Epp67zK9JZsoLv1unHVKsTmc8= X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzxb8RfmVk+R9yvFFOMxyIGC1jIuSvoRRGl/dFvVX8HKm6VX5lf5MEU+N3iEVFs /21L1b4bicl01Gh8A9Qk81EpMQhzobgwwpmRu/KYbsjV/Dslmn8au4fgiiUnL7Eng8jQpHx1Dce pJ7vUB9BUY1Jdy0cjrAiyxAPHhttnmghlyCp/SbuGNg/IOWwRs9lHYCtw0ehfxThdqSERIsU2no 74MUVFQp325DYUgt3KfNMDsDFV/2VoejWzarWqY75iu6FuOsBgL53k6jfHE8qYh9unClfBnfKIu QTqyQ1RQDd9eRcouCAT5l4lImjXrjeZssvZX7+t5c1svB1D6GNWM8yQ3wAkFVPiDtDtXgbs/BM8 9GCmg/JkweKEbauJySWxCpdhqi9hW6018WKOiMQHdwPVcWbV3EWPHubWd8kB+WCjbiXNtuzXEFF RdsAbLtJ4dZuilapvwB6vixERFLujorkMhcQ2a8eFNjFC/wbm9mx1UkWWJyR3l/M55VXEMwD328 SFNTg3Axah0LA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2303:b0:439:beb9:5a96 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43d150e8ba7mr11084985f8f.31.1775096380493; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.4.195.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43d1e2c3a01sm3815604f8f.12.2026.04.01.19.19.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2026 19:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 03:19:37 +0100 Message-Id: Cc: "Sylwester Nawrocki" , "Chanwoo Choi" , "Alim Akhtar" , "Sam Protsenko" , "Michael Turquette" , "Stephen Boyd" , "Rob Herring" , "Conor Dooley" , "Tudor Ambarus" , "Jassi Brar" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Peter Griffin" , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Exynos850 APM-to-AP mailbox support From: "Alexey Klimov" To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Alexey Klimov" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260320-exynos850-ap2apm-mailbox-v1-0-983eb3f296fc@linaro.org> <20260321-beautiful-garnet-magpie-de4fbd@quoll> In-Reply-To: <20260321-beautiful-garnet-magpie-de4fbd@quoll> On Sat Mar 21, 2026 at 10:44 AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 09:15:12PM +0000, Alexey Klimov wrote: >> Hi all, >>=20 >> This patch series introduces support for the APM-to-AP mailbox on the=20 >> Exynos850 SoC. This mailbox is required for communicating with the APM= =20 >> co-processor using ACPM. >>=20 >> The Exynos850 mailbox operates similarly to the existing gs101=20 >> implementation, but the register offsets and IRQ mask bits differ.=20 >> This series abstracts these differences into platform-specific data=20 >> structures matched via the device tree. >>=20 >> Also, it requires APM-to-AP mailbox clock in CMU_APM block. >>=20 >> In theory this can be split into two series with correct dependecies: >> device tree node requires clock changes to be merged. The suggestion >> is to let this go through Samsung SoC tree with corresponding acks >> if it is okay. > > I don't understand why this cannot be split into two seris > *practically*. What is exactly the dependency between mailbox and DTS, > that it had to be combined here? Do you suggest to send 3 single patches with proper dependencies description? DT bindings change first, then mailbox change that specificall= y depends on dt-bindings change and then dts update (which will depend on bot= h)? I thought that mbox driver change depends implicitly on bindings update? Best regards, Alexey