public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luka Gejak" <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: "Alexandru Hossu" <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<error27@gmail.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix missing frame length checks in OnAuthClient
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 06:47:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHTGFRNBOT79.2SLRPIN3GFMMV@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414213959.1028301-1-hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>

On Tue Apr 14, 2026 at 11:39 PM CEST, Alexandru Hossu wrote:
> OnAuthClient() accesses pframe without first verifying that pkt_len is
> large enough to contain a valid 802.11 management frame header:
>
> - get_da(pframe) reads bytes 4-9, requiring pkt_len >= 10
> - GetPrivacy(pframe) reads the FC field at bytes 0-1
>
> Additionally, when pkt_len < WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + _AUTH_IE_OFFSET_ the
> unsigned subtraction passed to rtw_get_ie() wraps around, causing it
> to scan well past the end of the buffer.
>
> Add an early check against WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN before any pframe access,
> and a second check against WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + offset + 6 after computing
> offset to guard the seq/status reads and the rtw_get_ie() call.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 554c0a3abf21 ("staging: Add rtl8723bs sdio wifi driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Hossu <hossu.alexandru@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Replace incorrect Reported-by tag with Suggested-by: Dan spotted the
>   missing length check during code review of the heap overflow fix; he
>   did not file a separate bug report
> - Add missing version changelog (the initial submission was incorrectly
>   labeled v2; no v1 was ever sent to the list)
>
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index 90f27665667a..884cd39ec756 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -860,6 +860,9 @@ unsigned int OnAuthClient(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_fram
>  	u8 *pframe = precv_frame->u.hdr.rx_data;
>  	uint pkt_len = precv_frame->u.hdr.len;
>  
> +	if (pkt_len < WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN)
> +		goto authclnt_fail;
> +
>  	/* check A1 matches or not */
>  	if (memcmp(myid(&(padapter->eeprompriv)), get_da(pframe), ETH_ALEN))
>  		return _SUCCESS;
> @@ -869,6 +872,9 @@ unsigned int OnAuthClient(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_fram
>  
>  	offset = (GetPrivacy(pframe)) ? 4 : 0;
>  
> +	if (pkt_len < WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + offset + 6)
> +		goto authclnt_fail;
> +
>  	seq	= le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)((SIZE_PTR)pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + offset + 2));
>  	status	= le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)((SIZE_PTR)pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + offset + 4));
>  

LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
Best regards,
Luka Gejak

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-15  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-14 21:39 [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix missing frame length checks in OnAuthClient Alexandru Hossu
2026-04-15  4:47 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
2026-04-15  4:56 ` Greg KH
2026-04-15  5:17   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-15  5:18   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-15  5:22     ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-15  8:47 ` Dan Carpenter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-13 20:28 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix heap overflow in OnAuthClient shared key path Alexandru Hossu
2026-04-14 14:53 ` [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: fix missing frame length checks in OnAuthClient Alexandru Hossu
2026-04-14 17:08   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DHTGFRNBOT79.2SLRPIN3GFMMV@linux.dev \
    --to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hossu.alexandru@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox