public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<driver-core@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: reject devices with unregistered buses
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:11:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DI5LDIQW45PE.LPIWCARJV7WC@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afHZWasOhRaeBCnt@hovoldconsulting.com>

On Wed Apr 29, 2026 at 12:11 PM CEST, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:09:04PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Mon Apr 27, 2026 at 12:28 PM CEST, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> > Trying to register a device on a bus which has not yet been registered
>> > used to trigger a NULL-pointer dereference, but since the const bus
>> > structure rework registration instead succeeds without the device being
>> > added to the bus.
>> >
>> > Reject devices with unregistered buses to catch any callers that get
>> > the ordering wrong and to handle bus registration failures more
>> > gracefully.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 5221b82d46f2 ("driver core: bus: bus_add/probe/remove_device() cleanups")
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org	# 6.3
>> 
>> Hm...this sounds like hardening and not like a "real" bug fix. Do you have a
>> specific reason why you added Cc: stable?
>
> It's certainly a bug fix and this change in behaviour was clearly
> unintended.
>
> Any caller getting the ordering wrong would now succeed in registering
> devices, but no driver would ever be bound which is harder to detect
> than the earlier crashes. 
>
> Whether any offenders have snuck in since 6.3 I don't know, but I still
> think this warrants a backport.

I see where you are coming from, and I agree that having an explicit error print
is an improvement over "the device just never got probed".

However, this isn't an actual bug -- it just happens to make a "real" bug less
obvious to catch.

That said, I don't see how this warrants a stable backport, i.e. it doesn't even
fall under the "this could be a problem" or "theoretical bug" category, which
typically are not accepted either.

As mentioned in the other thread, if this was relaxed, I'm happy to hear about
it.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-29 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27 10:28 [PATCH] driver core: reject devices with unregistered buses Johan Hovold
2026-04-28 19:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-04-29 10:11   ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 11:11     ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-04-29 11:33       ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 14:52         ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-04-29 15:08           ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 15:29             ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-04-29 16:00               ` Johan Hovold
2026-04-29 16:18                 ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DI5LDIQW45PE.LPIWCARJV7WC@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox