public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: limit `BitToken` entry reads
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 22:35:28 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DI5OFKEERXGP.1EFM9XNWQQ1YA@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421-fix-vbios-v3-2-8f648aef7a85@nvidia.com>

On Tue Apr 21, 2026 at 5:20 PM JST, Eliot Courtney wrote:
> If `header.token_size` is smaller than `BitToken`, then we currently can
> read past the end of `image.base.data`. Check that the token size is at
> least as big as `BitToken`.
>
> Fixes: dc70c6ae2441 ("gpu: nova-core: vbios: Add support to look up PMU table in FWSEC")
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/nova-core/vbios.rs | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/vbios.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/vbios.rs
> index 6de7e58e0da0..de856000de23 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/vbios.rs
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/vbios.rs
> @@ -423,31 +423,31 @@ impl BitToken {
>      /// Find a BIT token entry by BIT ID in a PciAtBiosImage
>      fn from_id(image: &PciAtBiosImage, token_id: u8) -> Result<Self> {
>          let header = &image.bit_header;
> +        let entry_size = usize::from(header.token_size);
> +
> +        if entry_size < size_of::<BitToken>() {
> +            return Err(EINVAL);
> +        }

You can get rid of this check if you convert the code as suggested
below.

>  
>          // Offset to the first token entry
>          let tokens_start = image.bit_offset + usize::from(header.header_size);
>  
>          for i in 0..usize::from(header.token_entries) {
> -            let entry_offset = tokens_start + (i * usize::from(header.token_size));
> -
> -            // Make sure we don't go out of bounds
> -            if entry_offset + usize::from(header.token_size) > image.base.data.len() {
> -                return Err(EINVAL);
> -            }
> +            let entry_offset = tokens_start + (i * entry_size);

Should we use checked arithmetic here?

> +            let entry = image
> +                .base
> +                .data
> +                .get(entry_offset..)
> +                .and_then(|data| data.get(..entry_size))
> +                .ok_or(EINVAL)?;
>  
>              // Check if this token has the requested ID
> -            if image.base.data[entry_offset] == token_id {
> +            if entry[0] == token_id {
>                  return Ok(BitToken {
> -                    id: image.base.data[entry_offset],
> -                    data_version: image.base.data[entry_offset + 1],
> -                    data_size: u16::from_le_bytes([
> -                        image.base.data[entry_offset + 2],
> -                        image.base.data[entry_offset + 3],
> -                    ]),
> -                    data_offset: u16::from_le_bytes([
> -                        image.base.data[entry_offset + 4],
> -                        image.base.data[entry_offset + 5],
> -                    ]),
> +                    id: entry[0],
> +                    data_version: entry[1],
> +                    data_size: u16::from_le_bytes([entry[2], entry[3]]),
> +                    data_offset: u16::from_le_bytes([entry[4], entry[5]]),

A common pattern in this file (with several such sites still to fix), is
that since Nova only supports little-endian we can leverage `FromBytes`
in order to avoid all these `from_le_bytes` call. Here this would look
as follows:

    for i in 0..usize::from(header.token_entries) {
        let entry_offset = i
            .checked_mul(entry_size)
            .and_then(|off| tokens_start.checked_add(off))
            .ok_or(EINVAL)?;

        let entry = image
            .base
            .data
            .get(entry_offset..entry_offset + entry_size)
            .and_then(|data| data.get(..entry_size))
            .ok_or(EINVAL)?;

        let (token, _) = BitToken::from_bytes_copy_prefix(entry).ok_or(EINVAL)?;

        if token.id == token_id {
            return Ok(token);
        }
    }

which has several benefits:

- No error-prone `entry[index]` accesses,
- The size check on `entry_size` is done for free by
  `from_bytes_copy_prefix`, and the slice bounds cannot be wrong,
- Shorter, more readable code overall.

Unfortunately we cannot just use `from_bytes_prefix` because we don't
have any alignment guarantee, but this is still an improvement IMHO.

If you go that way and derive `FromBytes` on `BitToken`, don't forget to
also make it `#[repr(C)]`. :)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-29 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21  8:20 [PATCH v3 00/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: harden various array accesses and refactor Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: fix various cases of reading past `BIOS_MAX_SCAN_LEN` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-29 13:24   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-29 14:32     ` Joel Fernandes
2026-05-01  5:15       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: limit `BitToken` entry reads Eliot Courtney
2026-04-29 13:35   ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-05-01  5:38     ` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: use checked ops and accesses in `FwSecBiosImage::ucode` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-29 13:50   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: use checked access in `FwSecBiosImage::header` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-29 13:56   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-05-01  6:07     ` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: use checked accesses in `setup_falcon_data` Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: drop unused falcon_data_offset from FwSecBiosBuilder Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: keep PmuLookupTable local in setup_falcon_data Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: compute FWSEC-relative Falcon data offset Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: simplify setup_falcon_data Eliot Courtney
2026-04-29 14:28   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: construct `FwSecBiosImage` directly from BIOS images Eliot Courtney
2026-04-21  8:20 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] gpu: nova-core: vbios: use the first PCI-AT and FWSEC images Eliot Courtney
2026-04-29 14:32   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-29 17:49     ` Gary Guo
2026-05-01 10:55       ` Eliot Courtney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DI5OFKEERXGP.1EFM9XNWQQ1YA@nvidia.com \
    --to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox