From: "Paul Louvel" <paul.louvel@bootlin.com>
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other
areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be)?b"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] talitos: allocate channels with main struct
Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 11:25:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIBHHV8JK79Y.2STMC24WJRDXU@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260506085653.1211263-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
On Wed May 6, 2026 at 10:56 AM CEST, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Use a flexible array member to combine allocations.
>
> Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis.
>
> Error in case of no channels as they are required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: error when no channels
> drivers/crypto/talitos.c | 19 +++++++------------
> drivers/crypto/talitos.h | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/talitos.c b/drivers/crypto/talitos.c
> index bc61d0fe3514..bd4cc06ee13c 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/talitos.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/talitos.c
> @@ -3409,14 +3409,20 @@ static int talitos_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> struct device *dev = &ofdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
> struct talitos_private *priv;
> + unsigned int num_channels;
> int i, err;
> int stride;
> struct resource *res;
>
> - priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct talitos_private), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,num-channels", &num_channels))
> + return -EINVAL;
Actually, this check does not guards against the num-channels property having a
value of 0 :
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.1/source/include/linux/of.h#L1384
This check is done here :
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.1/source/drivers/crypto/talitos.c#L3367
when checking the property data in the DT node. is_power_of_two does not
consider that 0 is a valid power of two.
Channels was not allocated because the DT node value was invalid. Ideally,
the driver should validate the DT node before requesting any resources, but this
is outside the scope of this patch.
--
Paul Louvel, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 8:56 [PATCH] talitos: allocate channels with main struct Rosen Penev
2026-05-06 9:25 ` Paul Louvel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-30 21:43 Rosen Penev
2026-05-05 5:50 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIBHHV8JK79Y.2STMC24WJRDXU@bootlin.com \
--to=paul.louvel@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox