From: "Rafael Passos" <rafael@rcpassos.me>
To: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "Rafael Passos" <rafael@rcpassos.me>, <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>,
<syzbot+9ca7674fa7521a3f1bc2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
<syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>, <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wireguard: Fix data-race in rx/tx counter
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:05:08 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJL786MPR9HO.BWHI3U37PDVM@rcpassos.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akHY4UEa1ab2PF-j@mit.edu>
On Sun Jun 28, 2026 at 11:34 PM -03, Theodore Tso wrote:
> One of the reasons why kcsan and syzbot can be quite noisy is that a
> human being needs to *think* and consider whether or not this is
> actually important. (One of the reasons why I'm not all that worried
> about our new AI overlords taking over the world. :-) Consider what
> is the worst that might happen if the tx/rx_bytes counter might not be
> completely accurate? Is it worth the performance penalty of using
> atomics (or the memory overhead of per-CPU counters)?
Yeah, I guess not.
Still, it was very interesting learning all this. I only knew per-cpu
counters by name, and Andrew's response led me to actually understand it.
I would like to thank you both!
And if I may, I would like to send my v2 patch (as a response in this
thread) just because it was very fun making and testing it. And I would
love feedback on it, if anything looks wrong. This was an amazing
learning opportunity for me.
Thanks,
Rafael Passos
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 14:33 [syzbot] [wireguard?] KCSAN: data-race in wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer / wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer (9) syzbot
2026-06-22 19:34 ` Rafael Passos
2026-06-28 20:38 ` [PATCH] Wireguard: Fix data-race in rx/tx counter Rafael Passos
2026-06-28 21:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-06-29 2:34 ` Theodore Tso
2026-06-29 3:05 ` Rafael Passos [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJL786MPR9HO.BWHI3U37PDVM@rcpassos.me \
--to=rafael@rcpassos.me \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+9ca7674fa7521a3f1bc2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox