The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>, <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	<boqun@kernel.org>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
	<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <lossin@kernel.org>,
	<a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <tmgross@umich.edu>, <tamird@kernel.org>,
	<acourbot@nvidia.com>, <work@onurozkan.dev>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<mhi@mailbox.org>, <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>,
	<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: irq: make Registration compatible with lifetime-bound drivers
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:12:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJSEF840P5ZP.10CNUQ0UHDLW8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ak0FAGpJtUH7VvHQ@google.com>

On Tue Jul 7, 2026 at 3:54 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> Why are the implementations for Arc/Box being removed?

The lifetime design enables us to just store references for shared ownership,
rather the needing a reference count, so it seems reasonable to remove those
blanket impls.

We could keep them a little longer until pin-init has self-referencial support,
but on the other hand they don't enable anything and are just for covinience, so
I'd rather drop them.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03 21:09 [PATCH] rust: irq: make Registration compatible with lifetime-bound drivers Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-07 13:40 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-07-07 13:54 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-07-07 14:12   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJSEF840P5ZP.10CNUQ0UHDLW8@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhi@mailbox.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tamird@kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox