The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Nico Pache" <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
	"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	"Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
	"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	"Gregory Price" <gourry@gourry.net>,
	"Ying Huang" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Qi Zheng" <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	"Kairui Song" <kasong@tencent.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Minchan Kim" <minchan@kernel.org>,
	"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/14] mm/zsmalloc: replace PG_private with pointer comparison
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 11:34:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKFF32LRYH32.16JIXI4LUS5E9@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anCuGbQ_-pTajAed@cmpxchg.org>

On Mon Aug 3, 2026 at 11:04 AM EDT, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 10:13:24PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
>> zsmalloc uses PG_private to indicate first zpdesc in the zspage chain.
>> Replace it with zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc. The check,
>> is_first_zpdesc(), is only used in VM_BUG_ON(), so performance impact
>> should be negligible.
>> 
>> It prepares for a future commit that remove PG_private.
>> 
>> No functional change intended.
>> 
>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
>> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
>> To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
>> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>  mm/zpdesc.h   |  2 +-
>>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 15 +++------------
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
>> index b8258dc78548d..4fd81c2e80769 100644
>> --- a/mm/zpdesc.h
>> +++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
>> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
>>   * with memcg_data.
>>   *
>>   * Page flags used:
>> - * * PG_private identifies the first component page.
>>   * * PG_locked is used by page migration code.
>> + * The first component page has zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc
>>   */
>>  struct zpdesc {
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> index 8204b76f78308..e8ef227624efa 100644
>> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> @@ -290,11 +290,6 @@ struct zs_pool {
>>  	atomic_t compaction_in_progress;
>>  };
>>  
>> -static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>> -{
>> -	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>> -}
>> -
>>  static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>  {
>>  	inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
>> @@ -478,7 +473,7 @@ static void record_obj(unsigned long handle, unsigned long obj)
>>  
>>  static inline bool __maybe_unused is_first_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>  {
>> -	return PagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>> +	return zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc;
>>  }
>
> There are two checks: get_first_zpdesc() and obj_allocated().
>
> static struct zpdesc *get_first_zpdesc(struct zspage *zspage)
> {
> 	struct zpdesc *first_zpdesc = zspage->first_zpdesc;
>
> 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(is_first_zpdesc(first_zpdesc), zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
> 	return first_zpdesc;
> }
>
> If you expand the helper, this seems kind of pointless now:
>
> 	first_zpdesc = zspage->first_zpdesc;
> 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(first_zpdesc != first_zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc, ...);
>
> Mayyybe it could make sense to assert first_zpdesc->zspage !=
> zspage. But that's a separate issue that the previous check didn't

Usama has the same comment about this.

> necessarily catch. And might not be worth checking, considering how
> trivial create_page_chain() is.
>
> In any case, it doesn't seem worth keeping the check as-is.
>
> And with one caller remaining, you could delete the helper and inline
> that expression into the check in obj_allocated(). What it does now is
> self-explanatory; it doesn't need another name like that PagePrivate()
> check before did.

How about the version below? Basically, I made is_first_zpdesc() more
straightforward for backpointer checking and first_zpdesc checking.

1. get_first_zpdesc() needs the backpointer check; the first_zpdesc check is
meaningless, since the assignment is done above.

2. obj_allocated() needs the first_zpdesc check; the backpointer check
is meaningless, since the zspage is from get_zspage().

Both conditions are needed for is_first_zpdesc().



diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
index b8258dc78548d..4fd81c2e80769 100644
--- a/mm/zpdesc.h
+++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
  * with memcg_data.
  *
  * Page flags used:
- * * PG_private identifies the first component page.
  * * PG_locked is used by page migration code.
+ * The first component page has zpdesc->zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc
  */
 struct zpdesc {
 	unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 8204b76f78308..d89253dc6dd40 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -290,11 +290,6 @@ struct zs_pool {
 	atomic_t compaction_in_progress;
 };
 
-static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
-{
-	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
-}
-
 static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
 {
 	inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
@@ -476,9 +471,10 @@ static void record_obj(unsigned long handle, unsigned long obj)
 	WRITE_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)handle, obj);
 }
 
-static inline bool __maybe_unused is_first_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
+static inline bool __maybe_unused is_first_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
+						  struct zspage *zspage)
 {
-	return PagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
+	return zpdesc->zspage == zspage && zspage->first_zpdesc == zpdesc;
 }
 
 /* Protected by class->lock */
@@ -496,7 +492,7 @@ static struct zpdesc *get_first_zpdesc(struct zspage *zspage)
 {
 	struct zpdesc *first_zpdesc = zspage->first_zpdesc;
 
-	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(first_zpdesc), zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(first_zpdesc, zspage), zpdesc_page(first_zpdesc));
 	return first_zpdesc;
 }
 
@@ -833,7 +829,7 @@ static inline bool obj_allocated(struct zpdesc *zpdesc, void *obj,
 	struct zspage *zspage = get_zspage(zpdesc);
 
 	if (unlikely(ZsHugePage(zspage))) {
-		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(zpdesc), zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
+		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!is_first_zpdesc(zpdesc, zspage), zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
 		handle = zpdesc->handle;
 	} else
 		handle = *(unsigned long *)obj;
@@ -848,9 +844,6 @@ static inline bool obj_allocated(struct zpdesc *zpdesc, void *obj,
 
 static void reset_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
 {
-	struct page *page = zpdesc_page(zpdesc);
-
-	ClearPagePrivate(page);
 	zpdesc->zspage = NULL;
 	zpdesc->next = NULL;
 	/* PageZsmalloc is sticky until the page is freed to the buddy. */
@@ -1001,8 +994,8 @@ static void create_page_chain(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
 	 * 1. all pages are linked together using zpdesc->next
 	 * 2. each sub-page point to zspage using zpdesc->zspage
 	 *
-	 * we set PG_private to identify the first zpdesc (i.e. no other zpdesc
-	 * has this flag set).
+	 * The first zpdesc has its zspage->first_zpdesc set to itself, no
+	 * other zpdesc has this set.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_zpdescs; i++) {
 		zpdesc = zpdescs[i];
@@ -1010,7 +1003,6 @@ static void create_page_chain(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
 		zpdesc->next = NULL;
 		if (i == 0) {
 			zspage->first_zpdesc = zpdesc;
-			zpdesc_set_first(zpdesc);
 			if (unlikely(class->objs_per_zspage == 1 &&
 					class->pages_per_zspage == 1))
 				SetZsHugePage(zspage);


-- 
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-01  2:13 [PATCH RFC 00/14] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 01/14] mm/zsmalloc: replace PG_private with pointer comparison Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:12   ` Usama Arif
2026-08-01 23:49     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-02 12:05       ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02 18:38         ` Zi Yan
2026-08-03 15:04   ` Johannes Weiner
2026-08-03 15:34     ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-08-03 16:53       ` Johannes Weiner
2026-08-03 21:05         ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 02/14] perf/ring_buffer: stop using PG_private as AUX page high-order marker Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:32   ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02  1:20     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 03/14] xen/grant-table: stop setting PG_private on pages for grant mapping Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:42   ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02  1:24     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 04/14] fs/crypto: stop setting PG_private on bounce page Zi Yan
2026-08-01 14:52   ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02  1:29     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-03 18:40   ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 05/14] mm/hugetlb: use direct assignment instead of folio_change_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-02 12:16   ` Usama Arif
2026-08-02 18:38     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 06/14] fs/f2fs: stop using PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-03 11:17   ` Chao Yu
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 07/14] fs/erofs: mm/pagemap: add readahead_folio_reverse() to avoid folio->private Zi Yan
2026-08-03  9:54   ` Jan Kara
2026-08-03 16:56     ` Zi Yan
2026-08-03 23:55   ` Gao Xiang
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 08/14] fs/erofs: use folio_attach/detach_private() instead of direct assignment Zi Yan
2026-08-03 23:40   ` Gao Xiang
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 09/14] mm/page-flags: check page/folio->private instead of PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 10/14] mm/page-flags: introduce folio_test_fs_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 11/14] treewide: remove folio_set/clear_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 12/14] treewide: replace PagePrivate() with page_private() Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 13/14] treewide: adjust comments on PagePrivate and PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-01  2:13 ` [PATCH RFC 14/14] mm/page-flags: remove PG_private Zi Yan
2026-08-03  9:07 ` [PATCH RFC 00/14] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Jürgen Groß
2026-08-03 18:13   ` Zi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DKFF32LRYH32.16JIXI4LUS5E9@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox