The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: <mikeba@sentinelone.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"JP Kobryn" <jp.kobryn@linux.dev>,
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] bpf: Check program recursion per task via bpf_ctx
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 01:04:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMSTTWR4MAET.1VEV3R66S7ZFY@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111-bpf-preempt-v2-r2-v2-2-9d8f6b952ad2@sentinelone.com>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 11:39 AM Mike Bazov via B4 Relay <devnull+mikeba.sentinelone.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> As a result, the same program can now run in two tasks at once on one
> CPU. Programs that use a per-CPU map as scratch space across helper
> calls may see another run's data, where the run was dropped before.

The kernel has such scratch space too: bpf_raw_tp_regs.
bpf_get_stack(), bpf_get_stackid() and bpf_perf_event_output() of fentry,
raw_tp and tp_btf progs take a slot of it with get_bpf_raw_tp_regs().
It doesn't disable preemption. Three tasks on one cpu:

  task A              task B              task C
  level 1, regs[0]
  <preempted>
                      level 2, regs[1]
                      <preempted>
  put: level 1
                                          level 2, regs[1]
                      uses the regs of C

B sends a sample or a stack trace with the regs of C.
This is an existing bug. Today it takes two or more progs.
With this patch A, B and C can be in one prog.
Doesn't hold the series, but I had to mention.

> Fixes: ca06f55b9002 ("bpf: Add per-program recursion prevention mechanism")
> Fixes: a46023d5616e ("tracing: Guard __DECLARE_TRACE() use of __DO_TRACE_CALL() with SRCU-fast")
> Fixes: 439ebd5b5708 ("bpf: Add sleepable support for raw tracepoint programs")

I don't think we will be sending them to stable soon.
This is a big behavior change.
Backports only after next merge window.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 19:39 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Check recursion per task for preemptible programs Mike Bazov via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: Avoid per-CPU private stack in preemptible tracing progs Mike Bazov via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 21:07   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-11 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] bpf: Check program recursion per task via bpf_ctx Mike Bazov via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  1:04   ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-11-12 19:30     ` [EXT.MSG] " Mike Bazov
2026-11-11 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] bpf: Check recursion per task for programs on syscall tracepoints Mike Bazov via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add trampoline and raw_tp preemption recursion test Mike Bazov via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 19:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] selftests/bpf: Test syscall tracepoint programs under preemption Mike Bazov via B4 Relay
2026-11-12  1:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: Check recursion per task for preemptible programs Alexei Starovoitov
2026-11-12 19:24   ` [EXT.MSG] " Mike Bazov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMSTTWR4MAET.1VEV3R66S7ZFY@gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jp.kobryn@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mikeba@sentinelone.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox