From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 18:08:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 18:08:37 -0500 Received: from linuxcare.com.au ([203.29.91.49]:17670 "EHLO front.linuxcare.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 18:08:25 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: ed@alcpress.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipchains vs netfilter performance In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2001 12:14:23 -0800." <3A585D9F.21907.1452FA04@localhost> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 22:37:15 +1100 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <3A585D9F.21907.1452FA04@localhost> you write: > I've noticed that my Linux boxes take quite a hit in terms of > packets per second rate when I define ipchains rules with > 2.2.X kernels. Does the netfilter replacement found in 2.4 > kernels improve this performance? Not really. What are your rules? Rusty. -- http://linux.conf.au The Linux conference Australia needed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/