From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:58:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:57:50 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:38665 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:57:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] make sym53c8xx.c and ncr53c8xx.c call pci_enable_device To: groudier@club-internet.fr (Gérard Roudier) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:58:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: rasmus@jaquet.dk (Rasmus Andersen), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Gérard Roudier" at Jan 29, 2001 10:50:31 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If the pci_enable_device() thing is to be added to the drivers, it must > preferently be placed after the checking against RAID attachement. You cant check the signature until the device has been enabled. Maybe you could poke the LSI guys and find out how windows PnP stuff handles this. I think the proposed change is ok because if the board is enabled then the enabling code won't touch it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/