From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:32:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:32:32 -0400 Received: from fw2.aub.dk ([195.24.1.195]:34804 "EHLO Princess") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:32:27 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Allan Sandfeld To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bzImage target for PPC Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:32:25 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 17 September 2001 12:07, Rusty Russell wrote: > Actually, Paul suggested it. As for bzlilo, that's even a problem on > non-lilo Intel (and should be subsumed by make install). Of course, > make install should be moved to the top level Makefile, but that's > another battle. Welll.... Shouldnt we fight it then? What is holding us back from deciding on a limited number of supported and implemented make targets and making these fast(e.g. moving install to top level)? This would then become a part of kbuild2.5 "Let's party like it's 2.4.99" > > Cheers, > Rusty. Cheers!