From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@sourceforge.net,
Paul.McKenney@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 06:44:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E15sVdv-0005rx-00@wagner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "13 Oct 2001 20:42:34 +0200." <k23d4njs9x.fsf@zero.aec.at>
In message <k23d4njs9x.fsf@zero.aec.at> you write:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110131015410.8707-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>,
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
>
> > - nobody has shown a case where existing normal locking ends up being
> > really a huge problem, and where RCU clearly helps.
>
> The poster child of such a case is module unloading. Keeping reference
> counts for every even non sleeping use of a module is very painful.
Well, module unloading requires only a small fraction of the read copy
update infrastructure (synchronize_kernel()), and can be implemented
without any scheduler changes, as it's not at all speed critical.
If nothing else, this thread has served to make more kernel hackers
aware of the technique, so they can try it themselves as desired.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-13 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-13 14:42 [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney
2001-10-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-14 2:04 ` Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists Paul E. McKenney
2001-10-14 7:25 ` [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-13 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2001-10-13 19:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-13 20:44 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2001-10-13 21:19 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-14 1:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-11 10:34 [Lse-tech] " Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 21:44 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 16:00 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 15:24 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 16:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-10 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-12 5:06 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-12 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-12 19:50 ` Al Dunsmuir
2001-10-13 1:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-13 1:54 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-13 2:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13 2:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-13 2:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-13 3:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13 2:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-13 2:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13 7:38 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-10 10:06 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 10:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10 11:43 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-12 3:27 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-12 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-12 18:53 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-13 7:25 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] <20011010182730.0077454b.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2001-10-10 9:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-11 6:50 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-10 7:58 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 7:06 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 7:21 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-10 9:06 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 6:54 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 4:43 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 15:45 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 2:05 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-10 5:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10 5:17 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-10 5:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-10 5:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10 6:01 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-10 15:23 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-10-10 6:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-10 6:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10 7:36 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-10 15:54 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-10-10 21:56 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-10 22:24 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-10-10 23:46 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-11 0:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-10 11:54 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-10 13:24 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2001-10-10 13:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E15sVdv-0005rx-00@wagner \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=Paul.McKenney@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox