Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -D1, 2.5.2-pre9, 2.4.17

Mike Kravetz
2002-01-11T12:04:40Z

On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:25:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput.
> > Higher is better.
>
> very interesting numbers, nice work Mike! I'd suggest the following
> additional test: please also run tests like VolanoMark with 'nice -n 19'.
> The O(1) scheduler's task-penalty method works in our favor in this case,
> since we know the test is CPU-bound we can move all processes to nice
> level 19.
>
> Ingo

I'll do that in the next go around. Right now, I'm trying to get some
TPC-H results.

--
Mike