From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18pre4aa1
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 07:27:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16ToWW-0002mf-00@starship.berlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020124002342.A630@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020124002342.A630@earthlink.net>
On January 24, 2002 06:23 am, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:
> Benchmarks on 2.4.18pre4aa1 and lots of other kernels at:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/k6-2-475.html
"dbench 64, 128, 192 on ext2fs. dbench may not be the best I/O benchmark,
but it does create a high load, and may put some pressure on the cpu and
i/o schedulers. Each dbench process creates about 21 megabytes worth of
files, so disk usage is 1.3 GB, 2.6 GB and 4.0 GB for the dbench runs. Big
enough so the tests cannot run from the buffer/page caches on this box."
Thanks kindly for the testing, but please don't use dbench any more for
benchmarks. If you are testing stability, fine, but dbench throughput
numbers are not good for much more than wild goose chases.
Even when mostly uncached, dbench still produces flaky results.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-24 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-24 5:23 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-24 6:27 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-01-25 0:09 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-28 9:53 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-28 15:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-28 20:28 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-28 23:40 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-29 0:15 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29 13:05 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Pavel Machek
2002-01-25 0:19 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 0:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 3:23 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 3:35 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 4:56 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 4:57 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 5:18 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 David Weinehall
2002-01-25 17:03 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 17:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dave Jones
2002-01-25 12:26 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dave Jones
2002-01-25 14:57 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-28 0:37 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-25 0:11 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-22 6:48 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-22 6:58 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
2002-01-22 7:37 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dan Chen
2002-01-22 7:43 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
2002-01-22 10:02 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Russell King
2002-01-22 10:12 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E16ToWW-0002mf-00@starship.berlin \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox